Thread Options
#2066500 - 02/29/16 02:40 PM MSB Fee Assessment
PrimeTime Offline
100 Club
PrimeTime
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 173
Was hoping to get some opinions regarding the following fee situation:

We're currently charging a fee for NBFI customers, as well as a specific fee to check-cashing MSB customers. We recently had a customer that does NOT meet the check-cashing criteria ($1000 per person per day), and due to their overall volume of 15-20 checks per week, a fee was not imposed on this customer.

This wouldn't fall into customer mistreatment/unfair or deceptive if I'm viewing it correctly, based on the fact that the customer we're not charging doesn't meet the definitional criteria associated with our other fees despite the fact that they do engage in an activity (check cashing) that does appear on the list.

Am I missing something here, or are we truly ok not to charge this customer a fee based on volume & definitional criteria?
_________________________
Life is like a bicycle. To keep your balance, you must keep moving.
-Albert Einstein

CAMS

Return to Top
BSA/AML/CIP/OFAC Forum
#2066504 - 02/29/16 03:01 PM Re: MSB Fee Assessment PrimeTime
Elwood P. Dowd Offline
10K Club
Elwood P. Dowd
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 21,939
Next to Harvey
You can charge the customer a fee because his tie doesn't go with his suit if you want to. (I've seen examples where a fee would be justified. wink )

Charging an "MSB fee" puts the emphasis on the wrong syllable. Fees are justified because the customer's activities require extra effort from your bank, not because they meet a specific legal criteria. Most banks monitor all NBFI's, including MSBs. The fee should be for "monitoring," not for being an MSB.

Any activity that makes your customer an NBFI and requires monitoring should generate a fee. Having an ATM on premise that is not totally controlled by a third party should also generate a fee.
_________________________
In this world you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant.

Return to Top
#2066517 - 02/29/16 03:16 PM Re: MSB Fee Assessment PrimeTime
PrimeTime Offline
100 Club
PrimeTime
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 173
Thanks for the response Ken!

So we would be able to charge customers of the same category different fees as well, which is based on the fact that although they're both MSB customers, they require different levels of monitoring and thus different levels of effort necessary, correct?
_________________________
Life is like a bicycle. To keep your balance, you must keep moving.
-Albert Einstein

CAMS

Return to Top
#2066519 - 02/29/16 03:28 PM Re: MSB Fee Assessment PrimeTime
Elwood P. Dowd Offline
10K Club
Elwood P. Dowd
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 21,939
Next to Harvey
What you need to do to be fair is to quantify what the fee is for, not assess it based on your customer's membership in a "class" of customers. In my opinion, you start with the idea that the fee is for monitoring then you add blocks based on the customer's activities:

* international transactions including IAT's,
* selling and reloading open system prepaid access devices,
* ACH origination,
* cashing checks,
* selling checks,
* currency exchanges,
* wire transfers.

This whole "de-risking" mess creates an expectation that banks will do a risk assessment before refusing to open an account. The secondary effect of that risk assessment should be to assemble the blocks of an appropriate fee schedule for customers that you do intend to bank. If anything provides an incentive for ongoing due diligence it would be the idea that you want to make certain that the customer's activities are as predicted because you want to make certain you have attached the right fee schedule.
_________________________
In this world you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant.

Return to Top

Moderator:  Andy_Z