It kind of sounds like temporary financing, I would be inclined to report this once the permanent financing replaced it. I have seen threads that support the permanent financing that replaces a HI purpose loan should be reported as a HI purpose (I think the argument is that the applicants requested the funds to improve the property with one request - the FI breaks it into two loans); I've also seen where the HI purpose gets lost with the temporary financing and the permanent financing is reported as a refinance.