Hatman, read Richard's message again! Regulator was using surrogates for gender bias on unsecured loans. Identified that females on average had higher APR than males. There was NO deviation from the pricing sheet, BUT women were more conservative and in most cases borrowed for a shorter period of time, or for less money. We had to pull defensive samples to show that there were no differences on the rates, the APR affected ONLY by shorter terms and/or lower principle.
When you consider the $99 flat fee has the same effect as interest, compute a $1500, 6 month loan and find out what the $99 does. Also, think of your state's usury laws. It could very easily kick it over in more conservative states.
ALSO, do you think it might discourage certain groups from applying with yourselves. Look at disparate impact. If it has a greater affect on certain segments of the population, there could be a fair lending issue too.
_________________________
Integrity. With it, nothing else matters. Without it, nothing else matters.