Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Thread Options Tools
#213085 - 07/20/04 01:20 PM Reg O Question
Anonymous
Unregistered

Question #1: Are "companies" of insiders able to be excluded from the "related interests" definition under Reg O if they have a certain type of collateral or additional source of income securing the loan?

Question #2: I know that loans to executive officers are excluded from Reg O if they are for their residence and secured by a first lien, however, what is the remaining limits for executive officers? Let's say, we have an executive officer and related interests of the executive officer?

Any help would be greatly appreciated!!!!

Return to Top
General Discussion
#213086 - 07/20/04 02:24 PM Re: Reg O Question
Andy_Z Offline
10K Club
Andy_Z
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 27,752
On the Net
I haven't reviewed this in some time. But they are not "excluded" from being related interests but with certain collateral, bonds, T-bills, etc., you can adjust the and increase the loan limits to insiders.

As to Q2, you have an individual lending limit that is in .2 of the definitions and an aggregate lending limit for all insiders explained in .4.
_________________________
AndyZ CRCM
My opinions are not necessarily my employers.
R+R-R=R+R
Rules and Regs minus Relationships equals Resentment and Rebellion. John Maxwell

Return to Top
#213087 - 07/20/04 02:25 PM Re: Reg O Question
Skittles Offline
10K Club
Skittles
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 13,965
TN
I thought the lending limit to executive officers (not including the home, education of children, etc.) is $100,000.
_________________________
My Opinions Only

Return to Top
#213088 - 07/20/04 02:49 PM Re: Reg O Question
Dollar Bill Offline
100 Club
Dollar Bill
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 107
Midwest
You are correct that the limit cannot exceed $100,000. However, I believe the definition states that the calculation is based on unimapired capital and unimpaired surplus...not to exceed $100,000.

Return to Top
#213089 - 07/20/04 03:49 PM Re: Reg O Question
Ted Dreyer Offline
Diamond Poster
Ted Dreyer
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,245
Quote:

I thought the lending limit to executive officers (not including the home, education of children, etc.) is $100,000.




Yes, but the etc. in your statement includes 215.5(c)(3) which excludes from the "other purpose" limit of $100,000 extensions of credit secured by certain types of collateral, such as US Treasury obligations and segregated deposit accounts at your institution.

Return to Top
#213090 - 07/20/04 04:18 PM Re: Reg O Question
Anonymous
Unregistered

Just a sidenote as long as Reg. O related interest and companies were mentioned.

I believe related interests (i.e., companies, etc.) of Reg. O "insiders" (exec. officers, principal shareholders, directors) are exempt from the overdraft Reg. O "paying an overdraft" restrictions. I believe you can pay as long as you follow standard practice (charge, etc.).

Good luck.

Return to Top
#213091 - 07/21/04 02:53 PM Re: Reg O Question
Anonymous
Unregistered

Did anyone ever hear of "Stand - Alone" Loans? I guess I am not asking clearly..... Let's say, that a Director owns 3 different companies. Company 1 is owned by him and his partner. Each has 50% ownership in the company. His partner has adequate additional income and resources that would be fully able to re-pay the loan by himself - can this loan be classified as a "stand-alone" loan and excluded from the Reg O loan balance for the director?

Return to Top
#213092 - 07/21/04 03:05 PM Re: Reg O Question
Deena Offline
Power Poster
Deena
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,701
PA
I've never heard of that and I wouldn't do it unless whoever's suggesting it to you can show you in the reg where it says it's okay (and I doubt they'll be able to do that).
_________________________
Opinions expressed are mine and not necessarily those of my employer.

Return to Top
#213093 - 07/21/04 03:10 PM Re: Reg O Question
Retired DQ Offline
10K Club
Retired DQ
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 40,766
Turnpike Exit 10
Quote:

Did anyone ever hear of "Stand - Alone" Loans? I guess I am not asking clearly..... Let's say, that a Director owns 3 different companies. Company 1 is owned by him and his partner. Each has 50% ownership in the company. His partner has adequate additional income and resources that would be fully able to re-pay the loan by himself - can this loan be classified as a "stand-alone" loan and excluded from the Reg O loan balance for the director?




Starter, I would email a regional examiner on that one, just to get their opinion. My guess is they will say uh-uh.
_________________________
Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - Mark Twain

Return to Top
#213094 - 07/21/04 03:17 PM Re: Reg O Question
Andy_Z Offline
10K Club
Andy_Z
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 27,752
On the Net
I would say, "not only no, but...". The director has liability, correct, and that is what you are tracking. If there is a lock on the amount of their liability you may be able to limit it to that amount. When I was on the loan desk we wanted everyone 100% liable though.
_________________________
AndyZ CRCM
My opinions are not necessarily my employers.
R+R-R=R+R
Rules and Regs minus Relationships equals Resentment and Rebellion. John Maxwell

Return to Top
#213095 - 07/21/04 04:35 PM Re: Reg O Question
Anonymous
Unregistered

http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/12feb20041500/edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2004/janqtr/pdf/12cfr31.2.pdf

If you go to this link, it is the appendix and talks about the combination / common enterprise stuff.

This is where if I read it gets confusing........

Return to Top
#213096 - 07/21/04 05:09 PM Re: Reg O Question
Anonymous
Unregistered

Also, another question - Are loans to Executive Officers limited to a maximum of $100,000 in agregate (excluing loans for residences and education)?

Return to Top
#213097 - 07/21/04 05:43 PM Re: Reg O Question
John Burnett Offline
10K Club
John Burnett
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 40,086
Cape Cod
The so-called "other purposes" loans are capped in the aggregate. The EO cannot get a bundle of $100,000 loans from his bank.

Other than that, there's the aggregate insider lending cap which will include all insider loans by the bank.
_________________________
John S. Burnett
BankersOnline.com
Fighting for Compliance since 1976
Bankers' Threads User #8

Return to Top
#213098 - 07/21/04 08:20 PM Re: Reg O Question
Anonymous
Unregistered

So for example, our CFO owns his own company and we lend the Company $80,000.00. Now the CFO comes to the Bank and wants to take out a $25,000 car loan. Can we grant the car loan?

Return to Top
#213099 - 07/21/04 08:26 PM Re: Reg O Question
Anonymous
Unregistered

Quote:

So for example, our CFO owns his own company and we lend the Company $80,000.00. Now the CFO comes to the Bank and wants to take out a $25,000 car loan. Can we grant the car loan?


AND, our legal lending limit is $6,000,000 AND, we do not have any other loans to this CFO (executive officer).

Return to Top
#213100 - 07/23/04 06:48 PM Re: Reg O Question
Anonymous
Unregistered

Quote:

So for example, our CFO owns his own company and we lend the Company $80,000.00. Now the CFO comes to the Bank and wants to take out a $25,000 car loan. Can we grant the car loan?




Can we grant the car loan?

Return to Top
#213101 - 07/23/04 09:49 PM Re: Reg O Question
Pale Rider Offline
10K Club
Pale Rider
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 34,318
under the Lone Star
No, unless you have as security cash or near cash items as identified in Reg O. If your collateral for these loans is not the type that would allow exclusion, you have exceeded the $100,000 limitation. So you have a CFO that works elswhere, sounds like (s)he is not busy enough.
_________________________
Societies that do not find work in and of itself "pleasing to God and requisite to Man," tend to be highly corrupt.


Return to Top
#213102 - 07/26/04 01:52 PM Re: Reg O Question
HallieK Offline
Gold Star
HallieK
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 369
Oklahoma
Please help me understand your answer. I thought that section 215.5 covered Executive Officer only, not their related interest. Are you including the loan to the related interest, on the assumption that the CFO holds the majority interest in the Company (which is a Partnership) or that the company is a DBA? Andy's recent webinar on Reg O, covered this subject in it's question and answer segment, and stated that the $100,000.00 did not included related interest. If that is a true statement than the loan to the CFO for $25,000.00 would not be a problem, as it would not exceed the $100,000.00, since he had no other individual loans.
Last edited by pac; 07/26/04 01:59 PM.
Return to Top
#213103 - 07/26/04 03:26 PM Re: Reg O Question
redsfan Offline
Power Poster
redsfan
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,455
The Pennant Race
If the related interest is a partnership, and the executive officers own or control a majority interest in the partnership, then the 215.5 limits will apply to extensions of credit to the partnership. See Section 215.5(b):

(b) No member bank may extend credit in an aggregate amount greater than the amount permitted in paragraph (c)(4) of this section to a partnership in which one or more of the bank's executive officers are partners and, either individually or together, hold a majority interest. For the purposes of paragraph (c)(4) of this section, the total amount of credit extended by a member bank to such partnership is considered to be extended to each executive officer of the member bank who is a member of the partnership.

I have always taken that to mean that partnership loans are included in an executive officer's 215.5 limits (presuming the ownership test is met).
_________________________
The opinions expressed here are personal and do not represent opinions of my employer.

Return to Top
#213104 - 07/27/04 01:00 PM Re: Reg O Question
HallieK Offline
Gold Star
HallieK
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 369
Oklahoma
Thanks pbrinker. The answer just throw me for a minute. I agree that if the company meets the partnership test it would have to be included in your totals. If it does not meet the test, it will not count.
Last edited by pac; 07/27/04 01:02 PM.
Return to Top
#213105 - 07/27/04 02:01 PM Re: Reg O Question
Anonymous
Unregistered

Doesn't it also state that if the executive officer is a "guarantor" than it would be a related interest - if not a guarantor, then it would NOT be a related interest?

Return to Top
#213106 - 07/27/04 02:19 PM Re: Reg O Question
HallieK Offline
Gold Star
HallieK
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 369
Oklahoma
It is my understanding that a guarantor and a related interest are two different things. One does not make the other. A related interest is a business entity which the EO controls (power to vote 25% or more). If you mean that if the EO is a guarantor for another entity (either natural person or legal entity) than that indebtedness must be included in the EO totals, I totally agree.

Return to Top
#213107 - 07/27/04 06:25 PM Re: Reg O Question
Anonymous
Unregistered

Is it true that loans that stand alone do not get included in director loans but are added as affiliated loans in the aggregate for Reg O purposes?

Return to Top
#213108 - 07/27/04 07:02 PM Re: Reg O Question
Anonymous
Unregistered

HELP - does anyone have a sample Reg O policy other then the one that they have available on Kirchman?

Return to Top
#213109 - 07/27/04 09:03 PM Re: Reg O Question
Andy_Z Offline
10K Club
Andy_Z
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 27,752
On the Net
Quote:

HELP - does anyone have a sample Reg O policy other then the one that they have available on Kirchman?




The Banker Store does.
_________________________
AndyZ CRCM
My opinions are not necessarily my employers.
R+R-R=R+R
Rules and Regs minus Relationships equals Resentment and Rebellion. John Maxwell

Return to Top
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3