Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Thread Options
#2135884 - 06/26/17 07:46 PM Improving BSA/AML
RVFlyboy Offline
Power Poster
RVFlyboy
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,992
Soaring over Georgia
Time is of the essence here for your responses to this question. I need responses by mid-morning tomorrow. I have an opportunity to channel some information to a congressman who can make a difference for a hearing coming up on BSA/AML effectiveness and burden. What is your number one thing you'd say could be done to improve the compliance environment regarding BSA/AML and/or enhance the effectiveness?

My first thought is that the $10,000 threshold for currency reporting could easily be raised to $20,000 without significant loss of effectiveness but reducing the CTR workload substantially.

Other thoughts?
_________________________
Jim Bedsole, CRCM, CBA, CFSA, CAFP
My posts - my opinions

Return to Top
BSA/AML/CIP/OFAC Forum
#2135910 - 06/26/17 08:25 PM Re: Improving BSA/AML RVFlyboy
PrimeTime Offline
100 Club
PrimeTime
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 173
Place the burden of Beneficial Ownership on whatever state body (i.e. Sec of State Business Registration) is associated with the registration of a business; rather than require banks to scramble to come up with it after the fact without any sort of a reference tool.
_________________________
Life is like a bicycle. To keep your balance, you must keep moving.
-Albert Einstein

CAMS

Return to Top
#2135915 - 06/26/17 08:31 PM Re: Improving BSA/AML RVFlyboy
edAudit Offline
Power Poster
edAudit
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,797
You are here
I would agree with PrimeTime. Due to FATF I do not see anything over $10,000 happening (although personally I agree with you).

Have regulators follow FinCen for SAR guidance. (lose the defensive SAR's)

BSA/AML should be risk based as per FFIEC not shotgun as most are seeing.
_________________________
Opinions can be considered as coming from anywhere but my employer.

CAMS


Return to Top
#2135918 - 06/26/17 08:35 PM Re: Improving BSA/AML RVFlyboy
PrimeTime Offline
100 Club
PrimeTime
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 173
Also loosen 314b/make it clear to FI's that it's okay to talk under 314b in order to foster more open communication; I find that far too often other banks are scared they're going to say the wrong thing or get in trouble, so instead they clam up when we both are well aware of the fact that something is wrong, and the lack of communication can potentially assist the criminal at the end of the day which is the opposite of the goal.
_________________________
Life is like a bicycle. To keep your balance, you must keep moving.
-Albert Einstein

CAMS

Return to Top
#2135976 - 06/27/17 01:59 PM Re: Improving BSA/AML RVFlyboy
Compl101TX Offline
Gold Star
Compl101TX
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 378
W. TX
If the federal government had to pay for each CTR we send them they would probably consider increasing the threshold.
_________________________
My opinion only.
AVP-Compliance

Return to Top
#2136012 - 06/27/17 03:38 PM Re: Improving BSA/AML RVFlyboy
RockChucker, CAMS Offline
Diamond Poster
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,700
The Country
I've also been a proponent of having the states bear the burden of beneficial ownership when the entity is registered. If they won't go for that I am all for raising the CTR limit to 20k.
_________________________
A successful man is one who can lay a firm foundation with the bricks others have thrown at him.
-David Brinkley

Return to Top
#2136062 - 06/27/17 05:50 PM Re: Improving BSA/AML RVFlyboy
Wildcat Rampage Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 95
Kentucky - Home of the 8 time ...
If I had wanted to go into law enforcement, I would have studied criminal justice when I was in college instead of economics, but as a pragmatist I have to do what the Bank needs me to do. As a Libertarian the whole idea that the government uses banks to report on how we use our cash sickens me - even if I understand the purpose.

That feels better.

I'm content with the CTR threshold. It's 2017 the CPI may have made $10,000 different, but electronic payments have made cash that much more suspicious so I consider it a wash.

I'd like to see rules enforcement limited to what is actually in regulation. I'm also tired of doing SARs just because I'm afraid of being criticized for not doing them in this situation: John Doe brings $30,000 check in today. He's a conspiracy guy and doesn't want "the government" to have "that form" on him so he gets $9,000 cash and deposits $21,000 cash. He comes back tomorrow and gets $9,000, then the day after to get $9,000, and finally the last day to get $3,000. I know the source of funds. It was legitimate, but the customer couldn't be convinced that the government didn't care if he got $30,000 in cash so now I have to do a structuring SAR. He's not a criminal, he's just.....a customer who doesn't think it's the government's business.
_________________________
Wildcat basketball isn't a matter of life and death, it's much more important than that.

Return to Top
#2136084 - 06/27/17 06:22 PM Re: Improving BSA/AML RVFlyboy
Daisy Doodle Offline
Diamond Poster
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,030
Southern U.S.
I'm with Wild Rampage. Give us a path out of filing defensive structuring SARS when the source of funds is not suspicious and we are not suspicious of the activity.

Return to Top
#2136121 - 06/27/17 08:11 PM Re: Improving BSA/AML RVFlyboy
Princess Romeo Offline

Power Poster
Princess Romeo
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,272
Where the heart is
Ack! I'm too late - but here goes anyways....

ELIMINATE the CTR and REPLACE it with a monthly reporting, similar to how we report to credit bureaus. The report will be made on any deposit account that had either a CUMULATIVE deposit of cash above a predetermined threshold, or a CUMULATIVE withdrawal of cash above a predetermined threshold (or both) with a margin of error +/- $100. The report will include the account number, the accountholder name, address, and TIN. The report feeds directly to FinCEN where the data can be analyzed across the country for concentrations/duplications of name, address, TIN.

Banks no longer have to file CTRs, or even SARS for structuring UNLESS they detect a pattern of accounts designed to circumvent the cumulative trigger. Then AML monitoring can focus on truly suspicious activity..
Last edited by Princess Romeo; 06/28/17 09:36 PM.
_________________________
CRCM,CAMS
Regulations are a poor substitute for ethics.
Just sayin'

Return to Top
#2136182 - 06/28/17 01:58 PM Re: Improving BSA/AML RVFlyboy
MScarn6942 Offline
Platinum Poster
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 756
Land Lacking in Lakes, IL
Princess, that could possibly even be tied at the CIF level instead of account level so that the multiple accounts thing becomes a non-issue!
_________________________
"Pressure is something you feel when you don't know what you're doing" - Peyton Manning

Return to Top
#2136214 - 06/28/17 03:09 PM Re: Improving BSA/AML RVFlyboy
TryingtoComply Offline
Diamond Poster
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,274
The West
Late to the party, but totally agree that this beneficial ownership requirement should really be managed by the states. All states should be required to know who the beneficial owners are for every registrant. And the records should be accessible to banks. Some states make the information available - others do not.
_________________________
TryingToComply
CRCM

Return to Top
#2136261 - 06/28/17 04:46 PM Re: Improving BSA/AML RVFlyboy
ACBbank Offline
Power Poster
ACBbank
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,453
New York City
Levin tried to pass that role to the states when he was in Congress and it never gained any real traction. While it's appropriate, it's a pipe dream due to the adamant opposition at the state level.
_________________________
"100 victories in 100 battles isnt the most skillful. Subduing the other's military w/o battle is the most skillful." Sun-Tzu

Return to Top
#2136264 - 06/28/17 04:56 PM Re: Improving BSA/AML RVFlyboy
#Just Jay Offline
10K Club
#Just Jay
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,390
Cheeseheadland
Those were the points we should have collectively been made when the rulemaking was proposed several years ago. Instead, we basically ignored it.
_________________________
I don't repeat gossip, so listen closely...

Return to Top
#2136356 - 06/28/17 09:36 PM Re: Improving BSA/AML RVFlyboy
Princess Romeo Offline

Power Poster
Princess Romeo
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,272
Where the heart is
I'm still liking my REPEAL and REPLACE CTRs concept. grin
_________________________
CRCM,CAMS
Regulations are a poor substitute for ethics.
Just sayin'

Return to Top
#2136373 - 06/29/17 11:34 AM Re: Improving BSA/AML Princess Romeo
Elwood P. Dowd Offline
10K Club
Elwood P. Dowd
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 21,939
Next to Harvey
After proposing "require the states to do it" legislation in every session of Congress since 2008, FinCEN realized it was a non starter. Their current concept is "require the IRS to do it" by mandating that EIN applicants name their beneficial owners on the application then include up to date information on their annual income tax returns.

That's not exactly what FATF is asking for, but it is a heck of a lot closer than "require the banks to do it."
_________________________
In this world you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant.

Return to Top
#2136437 - 06/29/17 04:03 PM Re: Improving BSA/AML RVFlyboy
RVFlyboy Offline
Power Poster
RVFlyboy
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,992
Soaring over Georgia
If you're interested (or have insomnia or something), here's a link to the Congressional subcommittee hearing yesterday where this was discussed:
http://bit.ly/2tnU2Qr
_________________________
Jim Bedsole, CRCM, CBA, CFSA, CAFP
My posts - my opinions

Return to Top

Moderator:  Andy_Z