Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Thread Options
#2210510 - 04/05/19 07:42 PM 2 borrowers, only 1 on title
anio1424 Offline
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 29
This might be an underwriting question rather than a regulatory question I'll give it a go. If a real estate secured loan is made to 2 borrowers and only 1 is on title can require that both be on title. And it we can and the change in title is not done until closing, do we give both the notice of right to rescind?

Return to Top
HMDA

   
HMDA Academy
#2210515 - 04/05/19 08:05 PM Re: 2 borrowers, only 1 on title anio1424
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,353
Galveston, TX
If a real estate secured loan is made to 2 borrowers and only 1 is on title can require that both be on title.

Who is on title to the property is not up to the lender. You determine if the borrowers can afford the loan and you get the owner of the property to pledge the collateral. Who owns the property has no impact on the loan and changing ownership could have serious tax consequences for the borrower and is really not a concern of the lender. Having a valid note and security interest is your only concern.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#2210517 - 04/05/19 08:25 PM Re: 2 borrowers, only 1 on title anio1424
anio1424 Offline
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 29
Sorry that I posted under the wrong thread. Should have been under Reg Z.

Thank you rlcarey. I appreciate your feedback.

Return to Top
#2210544 - 04/08/19 01:07 PM Re: 2 borrowers, only 1 on title anio1424
RR Joker Offline
10K Club
RR Joker
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 20,656
The Swamp
FWIW, I agree with Randy. It's not our place to dictate ownership in property.
_________________________
My opinion only. Not legal advice.

Say you'll haunt me - Stone Sour

Return to Top