Well, you might want to visit with your EIC to get their take, but the guidelines say:
The supervisory loan-to-value limits should be applied to the underlying property that collateralizes the loan. For loans that fund multiple phases of the same real estate project (e.g., a loan for both land development and construction of an office building), the appropriate loan-to-value limit is the limit applicable to the final phase of the project funded by the loan; however, loan disbursements should not exceed actual development or construction outlays.
So in your case, the purchase of raw land is 65% and if you are referring to 1-4 construction that is 85%.
Then you have:
Value means an opinion or estimate, set forth in an appraisal or evaluation, whichever may be appropriate, of the market value of real property, prepared in accordance with the agency's appraisal regulations and guidance. For loans to purchase an existing property, the term ``value'' means the lesser of the actual acquisition cost or the estimate of value.
This is not the purchase of existing property, so I am not too sure where the acquisition cost would be factored in. You still should not be disbursing more than construction costs at anytime.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer:
PPDocs.com