Skip to content
Thread Options
#2222513 - 09/27/19 06:03 PM Reg E - Double-Dipping
MBTCompliance Offline
Gold Star
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 340
We've had a customer file a Reg E claim with our Bank and a police report at the same time against the person who stole their card information and used it without their consent. Our customer has won the court case and will soon begin receiving restitution payments. It does not seem right to us for the customer to benefit from us having paid their claim in a situation where under MasterCard rules we likely will not have chargeback rights and have had to take a loss on the customer, yet at the same time the customer is going to receive payment from the thief, in essence double-dipping, receiving double the benefit. Can we refuse to pay their claim or ask them to withdraw their claim? Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Return to Top
eBanking / Technology
#2222520 - 09/27/19 06:16 PM Re: Reg E - Double-Dipping MBTCompliance
BrianC Online
Power Poster
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,325
If your customer is reimbursed by the Bank under Reg E rules, you become the financial victim, not the customer. The chain of liability is that you should be the injured party receiving restitution from the thief, not your customer.

I recommend contact legal counsel to see what steps your institution needs to take to redirect the restitution to you since you cannot deny the Reg E claim if an error actually occurred.
Sola Gratia, Sola Fides, Sola Scriptura, Solus Christus, Soli Deo Gloria!

Return to Top
#2222521 - 09/27/19 06:17 PM Re: Reg E - Double-Dipping MBTCompliance
rlcarey Online
10K Club
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 79,659
Galveston, TX
If you have made them whole, then the customer has no claim as far as the court goes and likely ended up lying to the court whether they realize it or not. The bank would step into the shoes of the customer at that point as far as restitution. You need to talk to your legal counsel.
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer:

Return to Top
#2222552 - 09/27/19 08:57 PM Re: Reg E - Double-Dipping MBTCompliance
Andy_Z Offline
10K Club
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 27,503
On the Net
I have to say, I agree with the above and love the fact that the customer, who likely would not have participated vigorously with the bank as the damaged party, won the case and the bank should be able at minimal cost to interject itself as the payee.

Please let us know if the bank pursues this and what happens.
My opinions are not necessarily my employers.
Rules and Regs minus Relationships equals Resentment and Rebellion. John Maxwell

Return to Top

Moderator:  Andy_Z