Thread Options
#2248775 - 02/05/21 07:24 PM Minimum Loan Payments
Nicole Offline
100 Club
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 127
Looking for some guidance... Our lenders are thinking about setting a minimum loan payment for real estate loans. For example all real estate loans will have a minimum payment of say $500. Is there any regulations on this, can we do this? Will it cause a fair lending issue?

Any help is greatly appreciated!

Return to Top
Lending Compliance
#2248776 - 02/05/21 07:31 PM Re: Minimum Loan Payments Nicole
Skittles Offline
10K Club
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 13,963
I have never heard of this. Do you know why they think this is a good idea - and will the DTI of all applicants allow this payment amount?
My Opinions Only

Return to Top
#2248783 - 02/05/21 07:50 PM Re: Minimum Loan Payments Nicole
raitchjay Offline
Power Poster
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 8,674
I would worry about disparate impact on minority borrowers.
I'm fixin' to fix that.

Return to Top
#2248786 - 02/05/21 08:16 PM Re: Minimum Loan Payments Nicole
rlcarey Online
10K Club
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 78,646
Galveston, TX
Yeah - building a business necessity case for that action would be difficult I believe.
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer:

Return to Top
#2248788 - 02/05/21 08:28 PM Re: Minimum Loan Payments Nicole
Richard Insley Offline
10K Club
Richard Insley
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 10,036
Toano, VA
I have more questions than answers, but can see one issue right away--unavailability of 30 year terms for your smaller loans. Look at your typical deals and see whether this practice could impact a significant percentage of your applicants.

Using a simple interest rate of 3%, a $100,000 loan would have 360 pmts of $421.60. After applying your $500 minimum payment rule, the loan could not have a term longer than 278 months. For lower IRs or loan amounts, the maximum term is even shorter.

At an IR of 3%, the break-even point is $118,595. What percentage of your new loans have principal amounts less than $118,595? All of them would have been disadvantaged by a $500 minimum payment policy. Now, look at the profile of that disadvantaged group--is it skewed in the direction of any of the protected characteristics? If yes, there's a disparate impact case to be considered.

Now, add another factor--secondary market requirements. Do your investors purchase loans with odd maturities, or only 20, 25, 30 year am schedules? If there's any restriction in your placement options, will this work to the disadvantage of the applicants subject to the minimum payment rule?
...gone fishing.

Return to Top

Moderator:  Andy_Z