Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Thread Options
#2251783 - 04/02/21 10:15 PM CTR Part 1
Banker Forever Offline
New Poster
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 24
I've read comments from a post from last year, but wanted to verify what we think is correct in this situation. If a husband makes a deposit to a joint account, is there one Part 1 with 2a checked as person conducting on own behalf, and then one Part 1 on the wife/joint accountholder with 2c checked as person on behalf transaction was conducted (which is the old way of doing it). Or, do we now have to have an additional Part 1 for husband with 2b checked for person conducting transaction for another?

Return to Top
BSA/AML/CIP/OFAC Forum
#2251840 - 04/05/21 09:04 PM Re: CTR Part 1 Banker Forever
John Burnett Offline
10K Club
John Burnett
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 40,086
Cape Cod
The old way is still the right way when one joint owner completes a reportable deposit to a joint account. One Part 1 for the conductor with 2a checked, and one Part 1 for each of the other joint owners with 2c checked.

But what if H deposits $5,000 and W deposits $7,000 (both in cash) to their joint account?

In that case, you do four part 1 entries:
  • H 2a with $5,000 in item 21
  • W 2c with $5,000 in item 21
  • W 2a with $7,000 in item 21
  • H 2c with $7,000 in item 21


and $12,000 in item 25

See Question 23 in FinCEN's CTR FAQs HERE. The answer to your original question is in the "note" at the end of the answer.
_________________________
John S. Burnett
BankersOnline.com
Fighting for Compliance since 1976
Bankers' Threads User #8

Return to Top
#2251853 - 04/06/21 01:12 PM Re: CTR Part 1 John Burnett
Banker Forever Offline
New Poster
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 24
Thank you.

Return to Top

Moderator:  Andy_Z