No - you are not wrong. It is owner occupied rental property if you believe all of that. The corporate co-borrower is meaningless if the corporation is 100% owned by the borrower as she already controls all corporate income and has nothing to do with the loan purpose.
If she needs a co-borrower, how is she meeting the ATR requirements. Any corporate income is already hers.
Sounds like some game playing.
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com