Thread Options
#2256652 - 07/13/21 09:35 PM ESIGN documentation using Docusign
BSAguy Offline
Gold Star
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 278
We are in the process of implementing Docusign. I'm trying to figure out what to maintain for documentation from a compliance standpoint, and I am curious as to what other banks are retaining. My initial thoughts are to retain the Docusign packet that shows when the customer/applicant opens the documents. I was asked if we need to retain any disclosure that is sent to the customer. My thought is we don't need to retain a copy of disclosures that don't vary from one account (or even account class) to the other. The ESIGN disclosure would be a good example. If the disclosure varies such as a Truth in Lending disclosure, we would retain that. Does this fall in line with what others are doing?

Return to Top
eBanking / Technology
#2256680 - 07/14/21 04:23 PM Re: ESIGN documentation using Docusign BSAguy
Richard Insley Offline
Power Poster
Richard Insley
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,999
Toano, VA
There are two issues here.

First, there's documentation of compliance with ESIGN's informed demonstrable consent rules. If you comply (and can prove it), then your e-documents become the legal equivalent of paper. ESIGN is no help. It doesn't require retention of anything. In the real world, however, we know that it didn't happen unless you can prove it happened. That means retention of some type of evidence of compliance with Section 7001(c) of ESIGN.

If your compliance with ESIGN is challenged in court, you will need to establish three things: the content of your pre-consent disclosures, affirmative consent by the consumer, and the nature and outcome of your "test drive." As you said, there's no need to retain copies of boilerplate notices. One sample of each version of things like the pre-consent disclosures should suffice--along with the begin/end dates of revisions. Affirmative consent is simply a matter of placing the right words in a document or message the consumer transmits to you. The "test drive" mechanism is best retained as a working demonstration that can be presented in court. Finally, you need some way to show that each consumer passed your test (the ESIGN "demonstration.")

After you have proven that you had the legal right to substitute electrons for trees, then you must turn to the second phase of your defense -- proving that you adhered to the timing and content requirements of the consumer regs (B, E, Z, DD, etc.)
...gone fishing.

Return to Top

Moderator:  Andy_Z