Thread Options
#2256674 - 07/14/21 03:53 PM Adverse Action
dmk124 Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 52
Is it wrong to send a denial letter when the applicant clearly decided not to continue with the loan? (email stating I wish to hold off on going any further) We already sent out the LE and the appraisal was conducted. We even charged her for the appraisal and credit report.

Return to Top
Lending Compliance
#2256675 - 07/14/21 03:54 PM Re: Adverse Action dmk124
raitchjay Offline
Power Poster
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 8,561
OK
Sounds like they withdrew, in which case there's no application left to deny.
_________________________
I'm fixin' to fix that.

Return to Top
#2256676 - 07/14/21 03:59 PM Re: Adverse Action dmk124
dmk124 Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 52
Exactly! Is it a violation or just tacky?

Return to Top
#2256678 - 07/14/21 04:20 PM Re: Adverse Action dmk124
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 77,216
Galveston, TX
What reason are you giving them for denying the loan?
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#2256682 - 07/14/21 04:40 PM Re: Adverse Action dmk124
dmk124 Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 52
Oh that's the wonderful thing, nothing is listed frown

Return to Top
#2256684 - 07/14/21 04:58 PM Re: Adverse Action dmk124
Adam Witmer Offline
Power Poster
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,572
Originally Posted by dmk124
Exactly! Is it a violation or just tacky?
It's probably more tacky than a violation, but if you are auditing it, this would be a good training opportunity to bring this up.

Technically, Reg B doesn't say you can't send a Notice of Action Taken when the application is expressly withdrawn. In fact, the commentary says you are "not required" to send the NAT, but doesn't say you can't:

"2. Expressly withdrawn applications. When an applicant expressly withdraws a credit application, the creditor is not required to comply with the notification requirements under ยง1002.9."

That said, you could have a violation if they put something on the NAT (like a denial reason) that wasn't true.

Again, this is probably a good opportunity for training.
_________________________
Adam Witmer, CRCM

All statements are my opinion, not those of my employer, and should not be taken as legal advice.
www.compliancecohort.com

Return to Top
#2256703 - 07/14/21 06:59 PM Re: Adverse Action dmk124
dmk124 Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 52
Thank you!!

Return to Top
#2256716 - 07/14/21 09:06 PM Re: Adverse Action dmk124
John Burnett Offline
10K Club
John Burnett
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 39,333
Cape Cod
It might be a reasonable practice to send a NAT to acknowledge that the applicant withdrew the application and the bank has placed it on file.
_________________________
John S. Burnett
BankersOnline.com
Fighting for Compliance since 1976
Bankers' Threads User #8

Return to Top
#2256725 - 07/15/21 11:59 AM Re: Adverse Action dmk124
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 77,216
Galveston, TX
I don't disagree and always encouraged my clients to send a letter, but not an adverse action notice. The letter said something like: We received your request to withdraw your application on xx/xx/xx. If this is not correct or you wish to reactivate this application in the future, please contact us at:

This is especially important if your NAT leaves the consumer the impression that the application has been denied. Many consumers think that when you have credit denied, it hurts their credit report. Not a far stretch to a UDAAP by the regulators.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top

Moderator:  Andy_Z