Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Thread Options
#2262154 - 11/05/21 12:02 PM Re: CFPB issues proposed Section 1071 rule John Burnett
John Burnett Offline
10K Club
John Burnett
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 40,086
Cape Cod
Piling on comments, using your own words, is an effective way of magnifying these concerns with the Bureau. Also note that Chopra himself seems concerned about the impact on small lenders (the threshold for mandatory data collection and reporting is ridiculously low in the proposal). The proposal is huge and the comment period too short. The fact that the Bureau backpedaled on getting the proposal out until it was sued should not be an excuse for creating havoc in the industry. The law, after all, was passed in 2010.
_________________________
John S. Burnett
BankersOnline.com
Fighting for Compliance since 1976
Bankers' Threads User #8

Return to Top
#2270249 - 05/10/22 02:36 PM Re: CFPB issues proposed Section 1071 rule John Burnett
IronP2717 Offline
100 Club
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 146
Anyone have an update on this topic?
I know the comment period closed in January.
I've been to several different sources for an update, but not finding anything.

Return to Top
#2270251 - 05/10/22 02:48 PM Re: CFPB issues proposed Section 1071 rule John Burnett
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,364
Galveston, TX
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#2270393 - 05/12/22 06:46 PM Re: CFPB issues proposed Section 1071 rule John Burnett
RVFlyboy Offline
Power Poster
RVFlyboy
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,991
Soaring over Georgia
You likely will not hear any update until such time as the CFPB issues the final rule to implement, which I expect will occur sometime before June 30, 2022 with an effective date of Jan 1, 2024. That said, I have no special insights that lead me to that expectation - just a logical analysis from the CFPB's stated desire to have the rule go into effect at the beginning of a calendar year and their stated plan to have an 18-month implementation timeline for the rule. I hope I'm wrong. I hope that they listen to the numerous comments I know they received that said an 18-month timeline was not enough and they put in at least a 2-year timeline, which could allow them to wait until Dec of this year to issue a final rule that would go into effect in Jan 2025. But knowing the CFPB's desire to get this data sooner rather than later, I think that is an overly optimistic hope. Just my two cents.
_________________________
Jim Bedsole, CRCM, CBA, CFSA, CAFP
My posts - my opinions

Return to Top
#2270426 - 05/13/22 05:10 PM Re: CFPB issues proposed Section 1071 rule RVFlyboy
RebekahL CRCM Offline
Platinum Poster
RebekahL CRCM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 875
Big Sky Country
Originally Posted by RVFlyboy
I hope that they listen to the numerous comments I know they received that said an 18-month timeline was not enough and they put in at least a 2-year timeline, which could allow them to wait until Dec of this year to issue a final rule that would go into effect in Jan 2025.

From your lips to God's ears, my friend!! grin
_________________________
Me, Type A? Maybe - I'm not done analyzing it yet.

Return to Top
#2271179 - 06/03/22 02:33 PM Re: CFPB issues proposed Section 1071 rule John Burnett
fmissle Offline
Diamond Poster
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,016
Pac NW
Well.. time for guesses. Anyone think it'll happen this month for a 1/1/24 requirement?

Return to Top
#2271192 - 06/03/22 04:56 PM Re: CFPB issues proposed Section 1071 rule John Burnett
InFairness, CRCM Offline
Platinum Poster
InFairness, CRCM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 928
USA
I read somewhere that the CFPB was looking to a mid-year implementation.
_________________________
Opinions are strictly my own, and have nothing to do with my employer.

Return to Top
#2272380 - 07/01/22 07:47 PM Re: CFPB issues proposed Section 1071 rule John Burnett
CalifDreamin Offline
Diamond Poster
CalifDreamin
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,264
Far from Calif
Looks like they are now looking at a final rule around March 2023: https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaViewRule?pubId=202204&RIN=3170-AA09
_________________________
The opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily reflect those of my employer
_._._._._._.
A.S.A.P.
Always
Say
A
Prayer
<><

Return to Top
#2272482 - 07/06/22 09:27 PM Re: CFPB issues proposed Section 1071 rule John Burnett
New Day Offline
100 Club
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 139
Does this affect consumer deposit transaction accounts? Someone said that to me and I was skeptical. How could I have been so far off the mark?

Return to Top
#2272483 - 07/06/22 09:44 PM Re: CFPB issues proposed Section 1071 rule John Burnett
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,364
Galveston, TX
Maybe whoever is telling you this should actually read it and then provide you with the citations.

Congress enacted section 1071 for the purpose of:

1. Facilitating enforcement of fair lending laws

2. Enabling communities, governmental entities, and creditors to identify business and community development needs and opportunities for women-owned, minority-owned, and small businesses
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#2272485 - 07/07/22 03:03 AM Re: CFPB issues proposed Section 1071 rule New Day
InFairness, CRCM Offline
Platinum Poster
InFairness, CRCM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 928
USA
Maybe whoever told you it affects deposit accounts was thinking of the revisions to the CFPB UDAAP exam manual?
_________________________
Opinions are strictly my own, and have nothing to do with my employer.

Return to Top
#2272539 - 07/07/22 09:05 PM Re: CFPB issues proposed Section 1071 rule John Burnett
Adam Witmer Offline
Power Poster
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,658
I agree with inFairness that this could be a reference to the CFPB's new approach to look for discrimination, even when fair lending rules don't apply (i.e. deposit accounts). Here is the CFPB's release explaining this: https://www.consumerfinance.gov/abo...fair-discrimination-in-consumer-finance/
_________________________
Adam Witmer, CRCM

All statements are my opinion, not those of my employer, and should not be taken as legal advice.
www.compliancecohort.com

Return to Top
#2272541 - 07/07/22 09:09 PM Re: CFPB issues proposed Section 1071 rule John Burnett
John Burnett Offline
10K Club
John Burnett
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 40,086
Cape Cod
That is quite separate from the CFPB's efforts to get a regulation in place to implement section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
_________________________
John S. Burnett
BankersOnline.com
Fighting for Compliance since 1976
Bankers' Threads User #8

Return to Top
#2275334 - 09/09/22 02:44 PM Re: CFPB issues proposed Section 1071 rule John Burnett
NoJustNo Offline
100 Club
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 221
Midwest
What is everyone thinking about timeline? Possibly a 3/2023 final rule - with 18-month implementation period?

Return to Top
#2275339 - 09/09/22 03:48 PM Re: CFPB issues proposed Section 1071 rule John Burnett
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,364
Galveston, TX
https://www.consumerfinancemonitor....ection-1071-final-rule-by-march-31-2023/

Unless the CFPB wants to be in contempt of court, then yes, we will see something by March 31st.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#2275360 - 09/09/22 08:00 PM Re: CFPB issues proposed Section 1071 rule John Burnett
rainman Offline
Power Poster
rainman
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,238
"Unless the CFPB wants to be in contempt of court . . ."

Based on their actions in recent years, you have to wonder if they are really concerned about this. (Wait, did I say that out loud?)
_________________________
Nobody's perfect, not even a perfect stranger.

Return to Top
#2275452 - 09/13/22 01:13 AM Re: CFPB issues proposed Section 1071 rule rainman
InFairness, CRCM Offline
Platinum Poster
InFairness, CRCM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 928
USA
Originally Posted by rainman
"Unless the CFPB wants to be in contempt of court . . ."

Based on their actions in recent years, you have to wonder if they are really concerned about this. (Wait, did I say that out loud?)

laugh laugh laugh
_________________________
Opinions are strictly my own, and have nothing to do with my employer.

Return to Top
#2280550 - 02/01/23 06:19 PM Re: CFPB issues proposed Section 1071 rule John Burnett
Cielo Offline
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 45
The date listed on the final rule is "01/00/2023". Wonder if it will be coming out within a few days - my guess is the 6th...which may be full moon? **SpooOOOOooky**

Return to Top
Page 2 of 2 1 2