Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Thread Options
#2266497 - 02/16/22 09:46 PM FAQ 36 first mortgagee didn't require flood insur
scb2011 Offline
Gold Star
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 258
TN
We are looking at making a 2nd lien loan on a home located in a SFHA. The 1st mortgage is at another institution that has not required flood insurance. According to FAQ 36, a bank must ensure sufficient flood coverage is in place for a prior lien and include the subordinate lien because the policy would pay the 1st mortgage holder first. Is that only for an NFIP policy? If the borrower obtains a private flood insurance policy, and only our bank is name as loss payee, would the unnamed mortgage holder still get paid first, or would we? Assuming this is allowed?

Return to Top
Flood Compliance
#2266500 - 02/16/22 09:56 PM Re: FAQ 36 first mortgagee didn't require flood insur scb2011
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,396
Galveston, TX
Yes, they would get paid first.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top