Thread Options
|
#356076 - 05/05/05 07:47 PM
Timing of OFAC verification
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 75
Wilmington, OH, USA
|
This may have been asked before, but I couldn't find it.
At what point should we be screening new customers against OFAC? Should we screen them before we open the account, or is acceptable to screen them in a batch each night. One of the factors specific to our bank is our teller system. It is online, real time so, depending on what the customer deposited, he/she could begin performing withdrawal transactions immediately.
_________________________
AMXSteve
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#356077 - 05/05/05 08:26 PM
Re: Timing of OFAC verification
|
10K Club
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 19,844
Pulling people out of the ditc...
|
you should scan prior to making any withdrawls from the account.
_________________________
Providing alternative truths since the invention of time
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#356078 - 05/05/05 10:02 PM
Re: Timing of OFAC verification
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
In the other CIP thread Ken Pegesas said there is no official list yet so what is the list that you use? Is it the list of the special blocked nationals?
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#356079 - 05/05/05 10:05 PM
Re: Timing of OFAC verification
|
10K Club
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 21,939
Next to Harvey
|
The OFAC (SDN) list is available. It is the "list of known or suspected terrorists" mentioned in the CIP regulations that has never been published.
_________________________
In this world you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#356080 - 05/06/05 01:35 PM
Re: Timing of OFAC verification
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I am original anon from other CIP question and this is now to confusing for me. In post 358137 you said OFAC is risk based and thatwe don't have to do anything specific. You said the check itself is not connected to CIP. In post 358137 you said the CIP regs do not require banks to check the OFAC list and you said no list of suspected terrorists is published. I am now totaly confuse because why even bother if we don't have to.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#356081 - 05/06/05 02:00 PM
Re: Timing of OFAC verification
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
I am original anon from other CIP question and this is now to confusing for me. In post 358137 you said OFAC is risk based and thatwe don't have to do anything specific. You said the check itself is not connected to CIP. In post 358137 you said the CIP regs do not require banks to check the OFAC list and you said no list of suspected terrorists is published. I am now totaly confuse because why even bother if we don't have to.
Where to begin, where to begin???
Re: OFAC scanning is risk-based, not required in black-letter law... Well, my mother used to have a way of saying "I'm not telling you what to do, you do what you want." that in fact meant "You know very well what you ought to do." Same here.
In another post John Burnett basically asked "If you're not planning to do scans of the OFAC list, what's your strategy for making sure you're not doing business with people the government says you can't do business with?"
If I had it handy, I'd print my list of the fines, jail terms and laws you can be charged under for doing business with someone on Treasury's list. Off the top of my head, the fines are $10K - $100K per offense, the jail time runs up to 10 years, and the flashier laws (ones I certainly don't want to see in a newspaper next to my bank or CEO's picture) have phrases like "Trading with the Enemy", "Foreign Narcotics Kingpin" and stuff like that.
But I'm not telling you what you have to do. You do what you want. Go ahead, open that business account for Daytona Pools in Richardson, TX. Write them a line of credit of $250,000, and wire some payments to their suppliers. You do what you think best....
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#356082 - 05/06/05 03:29 PM
Re: Timing of OFAC verification
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
Quote:
I am original anon from other CIP question and this is now to confusing for me. In post 358137 you said OFAC is risk based and thatwe don't have to do anything specific. You said the check itself is not connected to CIP. In post 358137 you said the CIP regs do not require banks to check the OFAC list and you said no list of suspected terrorists is published. I am now totaly confuse because why even bother if we don't have to.
Where to begin, where to begin???
Re: OFAC scanning is risk-based, not required in black-letter law... Well, my mother used to have a way of saying "I'm not telling you what to do, you do what you want." that in fact meant "You know very well what you ought to do." Same here.
In another post John Burnett basically asked "If you're not planning to do scans of the OFAC list, what's your strategy for making sure you're not doing business with people the government says you can't do business with?"
If I had it handy, I'd print my list of the fines, jail terms and laws you can be charged under for doing business with someone on Treasury's list. Off the top of my head, the fines are $10K - $100K per offense, the jail time runs up to 10 years, and the flashier laws (ones I certainly don't want to see in a newspaper next to my bank or CEO's picture) have phrases like "Trading with the Enemy", "Foreign Narcotics Kingpin" and stuff like that.
But I'm not telling you what you have to do. You do what you want. Go ahead, open that business account for Daytona Pools in Richardson, TX. Write them a line of credit of $250,000, and wire some payments to their suppliers. You do what you think best....
This is not an answer. We either must or we must not but which is it. Where is the rule saying it. One person says CIP regs do not require checks cause there is no list yet and that no requirements for specific checks. Just saying a fine might happen does'nt say anything cause the procedure is risk based not mandatory.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#356083 - 05/06/05 03:53 PM
Re: Timing of OFAC verification
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I'm beginning to think you're being intentionally difficult. Nonetheless, the Executive Order prohibits any US company, or company operating in the US from doing business with, providing or facilitating financial services to any party on that list.
How you accomplish that is up to you. But your regulators do get to express an opinion on the effectiveness of your approach.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#356085 - 05/06/05 04:14 PM
Re: Timing of OFAC verification
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
I'm beginning to think you're being intentionally difficult. Nonetheless, the Executive Order prohibits any US company, or company operating in the US from doing business with, providing or facilitating financial services to any party on that list.
I still dont know what list you mean. When you say list and exec order is this the official OFAC terrorist list of the foreign nationals to be blocked shown on OFAC web? What order and other list are you meaning here? Please just say whether the OFAC is mandatory and provide the supporting reg. The link to previous post from other thread said its not mandatory yet. I just want clarification.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#356087 - 05/06/05 06:48 PM
Re: Timing of OFAC verification
|
10K Club
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 40,086
Cape Cod
|
Let's try this approach --
There are two sets of rules. The first is the set from OFAC which oversimplify down to "Don't do business with any of the folks on our SDN list," and also include some prohibitions based on geography, governments, etc. OFAC does not have any rule that says you must check every person with whom you do business (or with whom your customers do business) against the OFAC list. Nor is there any regulation by any other agency that says that.
What the federal banking regulators have is a concern about safety and soundness of financial institutions. They insist that every financial institution have in place a policy and procedures dealing with OFAC. They don't dictate the content of those policies. They just want to see that the financial institution is aware of the risks of doing business with these bad guys, and has established reasonable procedures for preventing that from happening. If the bank has a weak policy or procedures in this area, the regulator may use its powers of persuasion (such as a down-tick in its rating of the bank's management) to have the procedures beefed up.
For what it's worth, there have been scores of posts on Bankers Threads about checking this, that, or another person (payees on cashier's checks, new account customers, loan applicants, wire transfer parties, ACH Originators and Receivers, vendors, etc.). The best advice of which I am aware is to have in place a risk-based policy and procedures designed to manage the risk of inadvertently releasing funds to someone on the OFAC lists. No one would ever seriously suggest you ignore the need to check altogether.
Section 103.121 of the Treasury's "Bank Secrecy Act" regulations is the section implementing section 326 of the USA PATRIOT Act, and is commonly referred to as the CIP (Customer ID Policy) section. One of the requirements of section 103.121 , specifically in paragraph 103.121(b)(4), is that the bank's CIP Policy provide for a check of the customer's name against a government list designated by the Treasury in conjunction with the Federal functional regulators. That list would be one that includes known or suspected terrorists or terrorist organizations.
That list has not yet been designated. People often read the requirement to say that you must check the OFAC SDN list, because the OFAC SDN list includes a lot of known or suspected terrorists and terrorist organizations. But the OFAC list is not designated as a government list to be checked in connection with 103.121(b)(4). No list is.
_________________________
John S. Burnett BankersOnline.com Fighting for Compliance since 1976 Bankers' Threads User #8
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
|
|