Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Thread Options
#500469 - 02/17/06 05:03 PM Reg. U
Maya Offline
100 Club
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 154
South Carolina
In reading Reg. U it states that a bank can loan 50% of the current market value of the stock. Current market value is defined in 221.2 as either the closing sale price of the security on the preceding business day or if the credit is used to finance the purchase of the security, the total cost of purchase. Does this mean that if a loan is secured by stock and the purpose is something other than to purchase the stock that the max. loan value is 50% of the value but if the purpose is to purchase the stock, the max. loan value is 50% of the purchase price? Also if the loan is to exercise an option is the max. loan value 50% of the current market value? In other words, does the fact that the loan is for the purpose of exercising an option change the 50% loan value? Thanks.

Return to Top
Lending Compliance
#500470 - 02/18/06 03:41 PM Re: Reg. U
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,371
Galveston, TX
Quote:

Does this mean that if a loan is secured by stock and the purpose is something other than to purchase the stock that the max. loan value is 50% of the value but if the purpose is to purchase the stock, the max. loan value is 50% of the purchase price?




If it is the purchase of stock - 50% is your number. If it is for other purposes - that number is up to the bank.

Quote:

In other words, does the fact that the loan is for the purpose of exercising an option change the 50% loan value?




"Exercising an option"? - if you are talking about exercising an option to take control of a stock - that is the same as a purchase and your loan could be no greater than 50% of the value of the underlying stock at the time the person exercised the option.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#500471 - 02/21/06 02:03 PM Re: Reg. U
Maya Offline
100 Club
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 154
South Carolina
Ricarey: This was the answer I gave to senior management but they want to refer to section 221.4 (b) (Employee stock option, purchase, and ownership plans)as giving them the right to exceed the 50%. Any thoughts about this section?

Return to Top
#500472 - 02/21/06 09:55 PM Re: Reg. U
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,371
Galveston, TX
Are they exercising stock options in the bank or bank holding company? If not - the bank is not a "plan lender". A "plan lender" is a lender who is also the issuer of the collateral. If you are, there are other restrictions on lending on your own stock that needs to be reviewed.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#500473 - 03/23/06 03:16 AM Re: Reg. U
Jan94 Offline
Platinum Poster
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 828
USA
I have a similar question. Lender is working on loan where customer is exercising some stock options and the cost is $6 million. He is planning to increase a line of credit to cover the $6 million cost but there is $8 million in taxes that he wants to finance in another loan. The current market value is $25 million and he wants to know if he can use that as the current market value of the collateral for the $8 MM tax loan? Section 221.2 (1) (iii) states that "If the credit is used to finance the purchase of the security, the total cost of purchase, which may include any commissions charged" is the "current market value." If capital gains taxes are considered as credit "used to finance the purchase" then it appears he would have to use the cost or market standard which would be of $6 million. Is this also stating that the loan could not be more than $3 million (50% of the cost)? Thank you.

Return to Top
#500474 - 03/23/06 01:39 PM Re: Reg. U
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,371
Galveston, TX
The definition under current market value 221.2 has three options, which are separated by an "or". If this stock is publicly traded, I would use (i) and if not, I would use (ii) rather than (iii).

If you refer to 221.123, it indicates that the contemporaneous payment of capital gains tax would be purpose credit when extended by a plan lender. Without other guidance, I would have to opine that the same would be applicable to a non-plan lender.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#500475 - 03/23/06 08:44 PM Re: Reg. U
Jan94 Offline
Platinum Poster
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 828
USA
The stock is not our bank holding company stock so we would not be a plan lender, but I also thought that the tax loan would still be considered purpose credit.

Return to Top

Moderator:  Andy_Z