Skip to content
GeoDataVision
Thread Options Tools
#609 - 02/07/01 02:27 PM adverse action notices
Anonymous
Unregistered

Are we required to send adverse action notices if we deny a customer a debit card based on the fact that they have had a large number of nsf checks? Also, what if they have a card and we decide to "kill" it due to repeat overdrawing of the account?

Return to Top
General Discussion
#610 - 02/07/01 02:56 PM Re: adverse action notices
Andy_Z Offline
10K Club
Andy_Z
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 27,503
On the Net
Adverse action notices under Reg. B apply to credit and the refusal to grant credit. If these do not involve OD lines you should be OK.

FCRA may come into play depending on how you find out about the NSFs. If this is from a CRA such as TeleCheck or Chex Systems you will have a disclosure to make, but it isn't your typical adverse action notice.

------------------
Andy Zavoina
Opinions stated are not necessarily that of my employer.

[This message has been edited by Andy Z (edited 02-07-2001).]

_________________________
AndyZ CRCM
My opinions are not necessarily my employers.
R+R-R=R+R
Rules and Regs minus Relationships equals Resentment and Rebellion. John Maxwell

Return to Top
#611 - 02/08/01 03:11 PM Re: adverse action notices
John Burnett Offline
10K Club
John Burnett
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 39,697
Cape Cod
. . . and, to answer the rest of your question, if the excess overdraft information is based on your own bank's experience with the customer, the FCRA doesn't come into play.

Ditto on "killing" a debit card due to experience. I think your steps here are (1) "hot list" or otherwise disable the card in order to stanch the flow of overdrafts; (2) notify the customer of your action, including the reason [this isn't a regulatory rule, but probably required from a customer-relations perspective]; and [maybe](3) figure out if there's a pattern that points to loose issuing practices.

_________________________
John S. Burnett
BankersOnline.com
Fighting for Compliance since 1976
Bankers' Threads User #8

Return to Top