Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Thread Options
#62783 - 02/21/03 02:45 PM Fulltime Equivalent Employees
BLR Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 64
MO
How do you figure parttime employees when counting employees per million? We have some parttime employees that work only every other Saturday (appr. 100 hours per year). We have been counting 2 parttime employees as 1 fulltime equivalent. Is this correct or is it based on the number of hours worked?

Return to Top
Human Resources
#62784 - 02/21/03 09:34 PM Re: Fulltime Equivalent Employees
Anonymous
Unregistered

I have always totals the hours for all my part-time employees and divided it by the normal hours worked by full-time employees. (i.e. 40 hours)

Return to Top
#62785 - 02/24/03 07:25 PM Re: Fulltime Equivalent Employees
1111 Offline
Platinum Poster
1111
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 580
100 divided by 2,080 = .048 employee equivalent.

2,080 hours per year = 40 hours per week (52 weeks)

Return to Top
#62786 - 02/24/03 09:22 PM Re: Fulltime Equivalent Employees
BLR Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 64
MO
I must be having a dumb flash. I don't understand your reply.

Return to Top
#62787 - 02/24/03 09:30 PM Re: Fulltime Equivalent Employees
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,371
Galveston, TX
I think that they are stating that there are normally 2080 hours in a year (full-time equivalent) - therefor 100/2080 = .048 FTE.

What type of report are you filling out? Internal or the call report?
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#62788 - 02/24/03 09:34 PM Re: Fulltime Equivalent Employees
Anonymous
Unregistered

Then wouldn' t that make 20 employees at 100 hrs = to 1 f-t employee??

Return to Top
#62789 - 02/24/03 09:35 PM Re: Fulltime Equivalent Employees
Lestie G Offline

Power Poster
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,608
Near the Land of Enchantment
An FTE - assuming a 40 hour work week - works 2080 hours per year (52 weeks X 40 hours). FTE's are computed based on that baseline. Therefore, if your employee works 100 hours per year (doesn't hardly seem worth it!) - you divide 100 into 2080, and get .048 FTE. Or about 1/20th of an FTE.

Another example: an employee works 15 hours per week. 15 times 52 = 780 hours per year. 780 divided by 2080 = .375 or approximately 1/3 of an FTE.

Looks like I was really slow on the reply button! Yes, anonymous, it would take 20 employees that work 100 hours per year to make one FTE.
Last edited by Lestie G; 02/24/03 09:36 PM.
_________________________
Opinions my own.

Return to Top
#62790 - 02/24/03 09:45 PM Re: Fulltime Equivalent Employees
BLR Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 64
MO
I need this information for both an internal report and the CALL report. Thanks for the explanation. I did finally figure it out. Guess I'm just having a "slow" day.

Return to Top
#62791 - 02/24/03 10:00 PM Re: Fulltime Equivalent Employees
1111 Offline
Platinum Poster
1111
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 580
O.K., now everyone is on the same page. The key word is equivalent, with the hours that each employee works calculated as an equivalent to a full-time person. The goal is, of course, to come up with the lowest possible FTE number so that you do not appear to be overstaffed when compared to your peer group.

Return to Top

Moderator:  Andy_Z, Gayla Sherry