Yes it was and MoMan's response is that the action date can be reported as the disbursement/settlement date, therefore using that date instead of the note date would allow the application date (in this case the 10th was used as an example) not to be after the action date.
And BTW and FWIW, I'm not a big fan of back dating notes either, technically that's falsifying bank records IMO. And I don't care if it is a widely accepted practice, it's still falsifying records.
_________________________
The opinions expressed are mine and they are not to be taken as legal advice.