Thread Options
#850117 - 11/06/07 09:40 PM Engagement Letter
biz Offline
Diamond Poster
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,032
Midwest
Perhaps someone can explain this to me. I have an engagement letter in front of me, which is addressed to the Audit Committee. In the area describing the responsibilities of the auditor, it says. "We will provide services as requested by your representatives, Mr. Jones (President) and Mrs. Smith. Bank authorizes us to accept instruction from your representatives and we may rely on their instructions as being that of the Bank."

This is all fine and dandy except Mr. Jones is not a representative of the Audit Committee. Is there not a conflict of interest with Mr. Jones being named by the audit firm (not by AC)-as a rep of the AC.

Thanks

Return to Top
Audit
#850147 - 11/06/07 09:57 PM Re: Engagement Letter biz
RR Sarah Offline
Diamond Poster
RR Sarah
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,479
Up North
It sounds to me like Mr. Jones and Mrs. Smith prepared the bid request? Also, it sounds as if Mr. Jones will be representing the bank and not specifically the Audit Committee. It is hard to tell without more information. Are you the Internal Auditor?
_________________________
Sometimes you have to burn a few bridges to keep the crazies from following you.

Return to Top
#850165 - 11/06/07 10:16 PM Re: Engagement Letter RR Sarah
biz Offline
Diamond Poster
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,032
Midwest
Yes, and before I raised a stink with Xternal auditors, I wanted to make sure I was justified. Not liking that open mouth, input foot stuff. Mr. Jones, in my opinion should be not be involved with or named in the engagement letter as a go to person.

But in the meantime the AC chair called me back and he doesn't like it either. so it is being removed. Thanks for your comment.

Return to Top
#850238 - 11/07/07 01:36 AM Re: Engagement Letter biz
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 77,215
Galveston, TX
It is not uncommon for an engagement letter for internal audits to name a representative of the bank to guide the day-to-day effort. The engagement letter should have already lined out the basic principles of the audit and the auditors just want clear guidance on the senior managment "go to" people so that they do not have to call a director for every little thing. If the auditing firm is good, they are not going to let manangement sway or determine the actual scope of the audit or the results.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top

Moderator:  Andy_Z