Thread Options
|
#945954 - 04/18/08 08:22 PM
Re: Is What He Said Wrong? Honestly?
A_G
|
10K Club
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 19,940
Pulling people out of the ditc...
|
snickerdoodles
_________________________
Providing alternative truths since the invention of time
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#945958 - 04/18/08 08:26 PM
Re: Is What He Said Wrong? Honestly?
rainman
|
Diamond Poster
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,436
|
Your parsing of the materiality standard may be accurate, but then again it may not. Well, anyone is free to make the argument that the Lewinsky matter was material, but I'm not sure what that would be. But it is not just "parsing" - perjury is a legal term and materiality is an essential element of the charge. No materiality, no perjury. Libby was convicted because he committed the crime. I disagree somewhat with your statement that the Plame matter was a "politically motivated, meritless" investigation. The CIA requested the investigation, remember. They have a strong interest in protecting their agents and front companies from being outed. Libby may not have been a big fish, but the investigation was necessary.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#945971 - 04/18/08 08:42 PM
Re: Is What He Said Wrong? Honestly?
Yossarian
|
Power Poster
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,912
Outside A Garage
|
Your parsing of the materiality standard may be accurate, but then again it may not. Well, anyone is free to make the argument that the Lewinsky matter was material, but I'm not sure what that would be. But it is not just "parsing" - perjury is a legal term and materiality is an essential element of the charge. No materiality, no perjury. Libby was convicted because he committed the crime. I disagree somewhat with your statement that the Plame matter was a "politically motivated, meritless" investigation. The CIA requested the investigation, remember. They have a strong interest in protecting their agents and front companies from being outed. Libby may not have been a big fish, but the investigation was necessary. Yes, except that just like the Duke Lacrosse case, the prosecutor new very early in the investigation the identity of the leaker (Richard Armitage) but prosecuting him didn't further his agenda.
_________________________
...you guys, I'm going home
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#945993 - 04/18/08 08:59 PM
Re: Is What He Said Wrong? Honestly?
straw
|
Diamond Poster
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,436
|
If there was nothing wrong with he did, why was his license revoked? Now you are changing what you claimed from "criminal" and committing "perjury" to "nothing wrong". In fact, his license was suspended for five years for making misleading statements in the deposition.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#945998 - 04/18/08 09:02 PM
Re: Is What He Said Wrong? Honestly?
Yossarian
|
Power Poster
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,121
|
If there was nothing wrong with he did, why was his license revoked? Now you are changing what you claimed from "criminal" and committing "perjury" to "nothing wrong". In fact, his license was suspended for five years for making misleading statements in the deposition. Ah, but doesn't rise to criminality, so its all ok. The POTUS makes false statements, (not misleading, he flat out lied) in a deposition. His arrogance that he can thumbs his nose at everything. He holds the everything with contempt. But you are right. He is technically not a criminal, just an obiviously morally deficient, ethically bankrupt individual who would not have been able to mop the floor of a company if he had behaved like this in the private world. Congrats on whom you hold in such high esteem.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#946041 - 04/18/08 09:26 PM
Re: Is What He Said Wrong? Honestly?
straw
|
Diamond Poster
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,436
|
The "misleading" part comes from the fact that he was given a definition of the term "sexual relations" that was drafted by Jones counsel that did not include oral sex.
As far as the tone of your response, all I did was challenge specific statements that you made. Don't take it so personally.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#946120 - 04/18/08 10:08 PM
Re: Is What He Said Wrong? Honestly?
straw
|
Diamond Poster
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,436
|
Let's just drop this. Have a good weekend, Straw.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#946124 - 04/18/08 10:11 PM
Re: Is What He Said Wrong? Honestly?
straw
|
10K Club
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 10,392
Curled up by the fire...
|
Did you guys know Heath Ledger died?
_________________________
Take responsibility for your life.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#946126 - 04/18/08 10:16 PM
Re: Is What He Said Wrong? Honestly?
Mrs. Rizzo
|
Diamond Poster
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,436
|
I didn't even know anyone kept a ledger like that!
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#946220 - 04/19/08 01:57 PM
Re: Is What He Said Wrong? Honestly?
Yossarian
|
10K Club
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,846
|
The "misleading" part comes from the fact that he was given a definition of the term "sexual relations" that was drafted by Jones counsel that did not include oral sex.
I wish you'd quit telling this lie. Under the definition approved by U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright during his deposition, "a person engages in 'sexual relations' when the person knowingly engages in or causes contact with the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks of any person with an intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person."
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#946221 - 04/19/08 02:03 PM
Re: Is What He Said Wrong? Honestly?
Jokerman
|
Power Poster
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,436
God Bless America
|
I posted something similar but it must have offended someone and got removed.
_________________________
Tag you're it!!
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#946239 - 04/20/08 02:22 AM
Re: Is What He Said Wrong? Honestly?
Jokerman
|
Diamond Poster
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,436
|
Lie???? Point out where that definition says "mouth".
Did Clinton have sexual relations with Lewinsky under that definition? He would have had to contact her "genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks". That didn't happen. If they had asked the question of Lewinsky it would have been true, but not when asked of Clinton.
Thanks for posting the definition, J!!!! Great way to prove my point.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#946240 - 04/20/08 03:23 AM
Re: Is What He Said Wrong? Honestly?
Yossarian
|
10K Club
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 34,318
under the Lone Star
|
didn't Mr. Clinton acknowledge fondling certain areas of Ms. Lewinsky that would meet the def?
_________________________
Societies that do not find work in and of itself "pleasing to God and requisite to Man," tend to be highly corrupt.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#946243 - 04/20/08 03:31 AM
Re: Is What He Said Wrong? Honestly?
Yossarian
|
10K Club
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,846
|
Lie???? Point out where that definition says "mouth".
Did Clinton have sexual relations with Lewinsky under that definition? He would have had to contact her "genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks". That didn't happen. If they had asked the question of Lewinsky it would have been true, but not when asked of Clinton.
Thanks for posting the definition, J!!!! Great way to prove my point. Oh my. We're so far in the tank for Slick Willie that we're willing to believe that he did "this" but not "that" when she says he did, in fact, do "that" and he's been proven to be a complete liar on the whole story. You ought to be embarrased. Unfortunately, you've probably perverted the truth enough in your own mind that you're not.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#946245 - 04/20/08 04:36 AM
Re: Is What He Said Wrong? Honestly?
Jokerman
|
Diamond Poster
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,436
|
he did "this" but not "that" when she says he did What are you talking about????? She says she performed oral sex but not intercourse. Where does this idea come from that she says something contrary to what he said? If you can find something that fits the definition, what is it?
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#946246 - 04/20/08 04:39 AM
Re: Is What He Said Wrong? Honestly?
Pale Rider
|
Diamond Poster
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,436
|
didn't Mr. Clinton acknowledge fondling certain areas of Ms. Lewinsky that would meet the def? Not that I've ever heard.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#946248 - 04/20/08 11:22 AM
Re: Is What He Said Wrong? Honestly?
Yossarian
|
10K Club
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 34,318
under the Lone Star
|
didn't Mr. Clinton acknowledge fondling certain areas of Ms. Lewinsky that would meet the def? Not that I've ever heard. Did not Ms. Lewinsky testify that he touched her breasts in order to arouse or gratify a desire? The fact that Clinton would have denied it would only fit the pattern of lies the crafted. I am with Jokerman on this one Yoss, it would appear you have drank the koolaid.
Last edited by Pale Rider; 04/20/08 11:23 AM.
_________________________
Societies that do not find work in and of itself "pleasing to God and requisite to Man," tend to be highly corrupt.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#946279 - 04/20/08 04:22 PM
Re: Is What He Said Wrong? Honestly?
Yossarian
|
10K Club
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,846
|
he did "this" but not "that" when she says he did What are you talking about????? She says she performed oral sex but not intercourse. Where does this idea come from that she says something contrary to what he said? If you can find something that fits the definition, what is it? Oh, please. This isn't even moderately difficult: According to Ms. Lewinsky, she performed oral sex on the President on nine occasions. On all nine of those occasions, the President fondled and kissed her bare breasts. He touched her genitals, both through her underwear and directly, bringing her to orgasm on two occasions. On one occasion, the President inserted a cigar into her [censored]. On another occasion, she and the President had brief genital-to-genital contact.(42) Now, maybe she's lying and he was telling the truth when he said he had never done anything that fit that particular definition of "sexual relations". But on what track record would you give him the benefit of the doubt???
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#946285 - 04/20/08 05:18 PM
Re: Is What He Said Wrong? Honestly?
Pale Rider
|
Diamond Poster
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,436
|
didn't Mr. Clinton acknowledge fondling certain areas of Ms. Lewinsky that would meet the def? Not that I've ever heard. The fact that Clinton would have denied it You do realize that you went from asking whether he had acknowledged it to saying he had denied it, right?
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#946287 - 04/20/08 05:34 PM
Re: Is What He Said Wrong? Honestly?
Jokerman
|
Diamond Poster
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,436
|
It looks as though you're right about their making conflicting statements. I was focused on your earlier inaccurate claim that it was a "lie" to say that the definition didn't cover oral sex.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
|
|