Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Thread Options
#946704 - 04/21/08 06:04 PM LOL Flood certifications
msboo Offline
Gold Star
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 260
I'm sure this has been addressed in numerous posts, but instead of looking through all the pages, I'm hoping someone can give me a clear answer to my question. If I understand right LOL means, if our vendor contract has LOL coverage. That means the vendor will do re-certifcaitons during the life of the loan. We can rely on the flood form as long as the date is less than 7 yrs. old? I've heard some people think it means we never have for order a flood dtermination as long as we have the loan on the books. Need some clarity.

Return to Top
Lending Compliance
#946709 - 04/21/08 06:07 PM Re: LOL Flood certifications msboo
David Dickinson Offline
10K Club
David Dickinson
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,762
Central City, NE
It would be best to clarify this with your flood vendor. Typically, LofL means as long as that same loan is on your books, the flood vendor agrees to notify you if there are any map changes affecting the property securing the loan.

Using that SFHDF for subsequent loans is not what LofL means. The 7 year rule is one of 3 factors determining if you can use a previous SFHDF for subsequent loans. Ask your vendor about using a previous SFHDF for subsequent loans. Some charge a small fee.
_________________________
David Dickinson
http://www.bankerscompliance.com

Return to Top
#946899 - 04/21/08 08:30 PM Re: LOL Flood certifications David Dickinson
Dan Persfull Offline
10K Club
Dan Persfull
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 47,530
Bloomington, IN
Quote:
the flood vendor agrees to notify you if there are any map changes affecting the property securing the loan.


This is a key element. One of the 3 factors David mentions is if there have been no map changes. It is possible that a map may change but not "affect the property". Our vendor only notifies us if the map change causes the property to go into a SFHA or to come out of a SFHA. If it (the map change) does not change the property status then the vendor does not notify us.
_________________________
The opinions expressed are mine and they are not to be taken as legal advice.

Return to Top
#947152 - 04/22/08 01:34 PM Re: LOL Flood certifications msboo
msboo Offline
Gold Star
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 260
Thanks guys for your help!

Return to Top
#947165 - 04/22/08 01:50 PM Re: LOL Flood certifications msboo
MidMOAuditor Offline
100 Club
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 105
Missouri
I saw the title and thought laugh out loud flood certifications. Hah, I need more coffee.

As a best practice, most banks pull a new flood determination any time there is a new note on the property.

Return to Top
#947869 - 04/23/08 01:44 AM Re: LOL Flood certifications MidMOAuditor
David Dickinson Offline
10K Club
David Dickinson
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,762
Central City, NE
Quote:
As a best practice, most banks pull a new flood determination any time there is a new note on the property.

Maybe at your bank, but I disagree that "MOST" banks pull a new certificate. This is not what the Act or your regulators require (see the old and new FAQ's). This is what the FEMA Guidelines suggest, but they are not requirements.
_________________________
David Dickinson
http://www.bankerscompliance.com

Return to Top
#947907 - 04/23/08 11:00 AM Re: LOL Flood certifications David Dickinson
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,364
Galveston, TX
David,

However, most banks probably should. It is just a much cleaner process and doesn't then cause the bank to violate their contract with the flood determination vendor. Life of "loan" means just that in the contract. Once you have a new loan - that life time coverage of the determination is suppose to cease because the contracts call for the banks to notify the vendor within XXX time of pay-off of the specific loan for which the FHD was pulled. The LOL coverage is not based on the property which would allow the bank to make subsequent loans on the same LOL determination. Banks need to read their contracts because almost everyone I have visited are in breach of contract with their vendors as they are not notifying them of pay-off. So, that means that the vendor may be continuing to provide coverage on 100s or 1,000s of FHD that are suppose to be dead. Can't wait for one of these vendor to get into trouble then start suing the banks for all the unnecessary time and effect they are expending.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#948431 - 04/23/08 07:33 PM Re: LOL Flood certifications MidMOAuditor
TattChica Offline
100 Club
TattChica
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 151
Va Beach, VA
Originally Posted By: MidMOAuditor
I saw the title and thought laugh out loud flood certifications. Hah, I need more coffee.

As a best practice, most banks pull a new flood determination any time there is a new note on the property.


Me too!!
_________________________
"I used to have a handle on life, but it broke!"

Return to Top
#948464 - 04/23/08 08:17 PM Re: LOL Flood certifications TattChica
Mint Julep Offline
Diamond Poster
Mint Julep
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,152
Tennessee
To follow up on what Mr. Carey has said ...

At a prior bank, some lenders were using the same SFHDF for multiple loans, but the loan ops clerk was cancelling life of loan coverage when any of the loans paid off. We found after a customer volunteered that his property had shifted into a flood zone during a map revision by FEMA. We had not gotten a notice because the coverage was cancelled.

Our policy changed the next day.
_________________________
Just another self-proclaimed expert ...

Return to Top
#948643 - 04/24/08 03:16 AM Re: LOL Flood certifications Mint Julep
David Dickinson Offline
10K Club
David Dickinson
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,762
Central City, NE
Randy: I don't disagree with your contractual issues. I also recommend banks contact their vendors and discuss this issue. Some don't care, some charge $1 - $5 for subsequent loans.

My point is that I have over 500 clients. "Most" is not accurate of our clients and I didn't want msboo to think this was the a regulatory requirement.
_________________________
David Dickinson
http://www.bankerscompliance.com

Return to Top

Moderator:  Andy_Z