Skip to content
GeoDataVision
Learn More - Click Here!

Thread Options
#940846 - 04/11/08 07:01 PM HB 2770
mzachau, CRCM Offline
Gold Star
mzachau, CRCM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 470
San Francisco
I just received notification regarding the newly passed house bill 2770 "Mortgage Lending and Homeownership". In the New Section (3)it says a disclosure summary form needs to be adopted that is reasonably understandable to the average person without the aid of a third-party resoursce.

Is anyone aware of any sample material?

Return to Top
#947896 - 04/23/08 04:58 AM Re: HB 2770 mzachau, CRCM
rainman Offline
Power Poster
rainman
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,103
The DFI will create this document and lenders will be required to use it - you don't have to make up your own.

Also, if you're an FSB (OTS regulated), this disclosure requirement is preempted by the HOLA and OTS regulations (12 CFR 560.2). Don't know if your bank wants to be the "test case" but if DFI, the AG, or a consumer challenged your bank about not complying, odds are in your favor. Check with your counsel about that.
_________________________
Nobody's perfect, not even a perfect stranger.

Return to Top
#967825 - 06/02/08 09:48 PM Re: HB 2770 rainman
starfish Offline
Gold Star
starfish
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 416
Seattle
On May 22, 2008, the DFI sent out a memo to all CEOs of WA State Chartered Financial Institutions regarding this new legislation. In the memo, it states that "during the rulemaking process, banks are not exempt from complying with the provisions and should seek legal counsel and take appropriate steps to comply with the law and minimize any legal risk of non-compliance." Has anyone come up with a "mortgage disclosure form" to assist them during the interim period?

Return to Top
#968099 - 06/03/08 03:11 PM Re: HB 2770 starfish
'Lil Freak! Offline
10K Club
'Lil Freak!
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,596
The psych ward
Thereís a proposed draft located here . There was a preliminary rulemaking meeting for SHB 2770 yesterday, but the outcome of the meeting has not yet been published.
_________________________
No, I didn't lose my mind. It got scared and ran away.

Return to Top
#972802 - 06/11/08 12:16 AM Re: HB 2770 'Lil Freak!
fmissle Online
Platinum Poster
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 999
Pac NW
I just found HB 2770. As we are chartered in Oregon, but do of course also make loans in WA.

They way I read this, Commercial Loans are not exempt. Does everyone else read it the same way?

Return to Top
#974195 - 06/12/08 07:06 PM Re: HB 2770 fmissle
Risky Business Offline
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 39
Washington State
The way I read it is that it is driven by collateral and if you have a commercial loan secured by single or multiple family dwelling of four or less units, this disclosure applies. I'm curious, since it became effective today, has anybody out there determined yet how they will comply? Will you be preparing the disclosures manually or have you already received updates to your loan software? There still seems to be a lot of unanswered questions out there not covered in the law....

Return to Top
#974207 - 06/12/08 07:12 PM Re: HB 2770 Risky Business
fmissle Online
Platinum Poster
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 999
Pac NW
Originally Posted By: Jannon
The way I read it is that it is driven by collateral and if you have a commercial loan secured by single or multiple family dwelling of four or less units, this disclosure applies. I'm curious, since it became effective today, has anybody out there determined yet how they will comply? Will you be preparing the disclosures manually or have you already received updates to your loan software? There still seems to be a lot of unanswered questions out there not covered in the law....


Than I think we're both reading this the same way.
We haven't done anything yet, in fact, I just sent it to council for review. I'm guessing we'll be out of compliance for at least a month.

Return to Top
#974795 - 06/13/08 03:34 PM Re: HB 2770 fmissle
river girl Offline
Diamond Poster
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,005
The DFI is providing a sample disclosure so you don't have to invent one. But I need clarification on whether this new disclosure is required for just purchases or is this for any closed end loan secured by residential mortgage located in Washington state.

Return to Top
#974911 - 06/13/08 04:54 PM Re: HB 2770 river girl
'Lil Freak! Offline
10K Club
'Lil Freak!
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,596
The psych ward
I think you need to steer clear of Regulation Zís definition of residential mortgage transaction. The Bill defines a residential mortgage loan as ďan extension of credit secured by residential real property located in this state upon which is constructed or intended to be constructed, a single-family dwelling or multiple-family dwelling of four or less units.Ē I didnít notice any differentiation in the Bill between purchase and refi transactions.
_________________________
No, I didn't lose my mind. It got scared and ran away.

Return to Top
#974920 - 06/13/08 05:01 PM Re: HB 2770 'Lil Freak!
rainman Offline
Power Poster
rainman
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,103
That's right, LF - all closed-end transactions are covered. Not only that, the bill doesn't specifically exclude open-end transactions. It says that DFI can issue regulations to clarify which parts of the statute apply to open-end transactions, but the draft regs didn't say anything about it. Informally, DFI has stated they don't see it applying to HELOCs.
_________________________
Nobody's perfect, not even a perfect stranger.

Return to Top
#975119 - 06/13/08 07:52 PM Re: HB 2770 rainman
fmissle Online
Platinum Poster
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 999
Pac NW
I'm so glad that they've given such clear guidance on something as important as this.

I'll continue to look at it, but this looks to be something that will heavily impact all of our WA loans going forward.

Return to Top
#1016325 - 08/08/08 09:14 PM Re: HB 2770 fmissle
Moman Offline
Platinum Poster
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 505
WA
If you have not already done so, check out DFI's website on their Proposed draft number 3. View Draft Disclosure Summary Rules at:

http://www.dfi.wa.gov/resources/2770_disclosure_rulemaking.htm

Return to Top
#1077928 - 11/06/08 06:53 PM Re: HB 2770 Moman
RFitzpatrick Offline
Gold Star
RFitzpatrick
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 424
Pacific NW
Well the final rule and approved forms came out yesterday. Compliance expected by December 5th.

See the forms at the DFI website
_________________________
Liability for taking my advice is limited to the amount you paid for it.

Return to Top
#1080496 - 11/12/08 05:31 PM Re: HB 2770 RFitzpatrick
river girl Offline
Diamond Poster
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,005
Maybe my brain is still on a day off but the final rule says this does not apply to business, commercial, agricultural, no rental, no reverse mortgage, no bridge loan, and no open or closed end heloc.
Is the final rule saying this applies only to purchases for consumer purposes.
I am having trouble figuring out why they talk about the definition of closing when we would use a ROR and when we wouldn't.
Which loans are included in this new disclosure that would require a ROR?

Return to Top
#1225423 - 07/31/09 12:02 AM Re: HB 2770 rainman
EmilyAnn Offline
Gold Star
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 273
I spoke with DFI's General Counsel regarding pre-emption of this disclosure requirement for OCC and OTS regulated institutions. His response is that the law applies to those institutions specified as "financial institutions" under HB 2770. Here is the definition from that law:

(6) "Financial institution" means commercial banks and alien banks subject to regulation under Title 30 RCW, savings banks subject to regulation under Title 32 RCW, savings associations subject to regulation under Title 33 RCW, credit unions subject to regulation under chapter 31.12 RCW, consumer loan companies subject to regulation under chapter 31.04 RCW, and mortgage brokers and lenders subject to regulation under chapter 19.146 RCW.

So, the law does not apply to OTS and OCC regulated banks. In addition, OCC regulation also has a pre-emption clause for national banks in 12 CFR 34.4(a)(9), which specifies the applicability of state law to real estate lending. This provision is similar to the one noted for OTS banks under 12 CFR 560.2.

Return to Top
#1838991 - 08/02/13 05:20 PM Re: HB 2770 mzachau, CRCM
EmilyAnn Offline
Gold Star
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 273
Hi all. We are making the leap from national to state chartered, so unfortunately the pre-emption clause noted above will no longer apply to us. It's been awhile since we last looked at this (2009), and in looking at the RCW updated in 2012, it appears that as long as you comply with RESPA, the one-page disclosure is not required as an additional disclosure (we're looking at RCW 19.144.020(4), which was added as the result of a 2012 legislative change).

Are we reading this correctly? The only other potential issue we see is that we might need to provide the one-page disclosure on HELOCs, since the RCW definition of "residential mortgage loan" does not specifically exclude open-end loans, and HELOCs don't receive the GFE.

Any thoughts or information on how you are handling this disclosure would be very much appreciated by this new state bank smile

Thank you!

Return to Top
#1838993 - 08/02/13 05:24 PM Re: HB 2770 mzachau, CRCM
EmilyAnn Offline
Gold Star
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 273
My apologies, I missed the last post in the Washington specific forum (was searching through Google instead of going directly to the forum). In any case, I see the one-page disclosure summary is no longer required. However, your thoughts on the HELOC issue would still very much be appreciated.

Thanks!

Return to Top