The OCC also published the list in AL 2000-3. It's generic; non OCC supervised banks should consider it as well.
Since your OCC examiner is a source of criticism, but not counsel, I will repeat what an OCC examiner told an associate. (Remember, this is anecdotal, it is one examiner talking, not the agency.) This examiner suggested that this midwestern bank painstaking identify every customer that was classified as a high risk business and maintain a folder for each. As you indicate, monitoring should take place on a daily basis for all accounts. However, the high risk accounts were to receive a documented quarterly review where BSA, not customer service, personnel went through and evaluated all transactions, cash flow, payees etc. relative to the type of business the customer is in. The review was not to focus on cash, but all types of receipts and disbursements. The reviews were to be placed in the file.
You get the idea...
There are a lot of banks looking for the specifics of AML programs that the agencies, and now the law, require. The OCC's exmination handbook is the most current and the most helpful, but at 30 months old it is out of date.
_________________________
In this world you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant.