Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Thread Options
#1816333 - 05/21/13 11:59 PM Force Placed hazard Insurance Coverage
jlroberts Offline
Diamond Poster
jlroberts
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,601
Ohio
We currently force place for the remaining principal balance on the loan (except Freddie Mac loans which requires the higher of the unpaid balance or 80% of the replacement cost), we are wondering how others are determining the coverage on your portfolio loans. We are thinking about starting to force placing the same coverage amount on the policy being cancelled.

Return to Top
Mortgage Servicing Rules
#1816384 - 05/22/13 01:49 PM Re: Force Placed hazard Insurance Coverage jlroberts
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,364
Galveston, TX
Based on recent lawsuits, I suggest force placing the minimum insurance required under your loan contract.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#1816604 - 05/22/13 07:37 PM Re: Force Placed hazard Insurance Coverage jlroberts
midwestriver Offline
Junior Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 37
Many in the industry are recognizing that using the replacement cost value (RCV), as approximated by the coverage amount of the last known acceptable insurance policy obtained by the borrower (LKCA) is the appropriate method for determining the coverage amount for LPI.

Using some other method, such as the unpaid principal balance (UPB‖) or lesser of the UPB or LKCA would result in borrowers with inadequate coverage to repair their properties, leading to increased litigation risk to servicers and investors. Such method would also be inconsistent with states‘ position on appropriate coverage amounts.

Return to Top
#1817119 - 05/24/13 08:26 AM Re: Force Placed hazard Insurance Coverage jlroberts
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,364
Galveston, TX
Where did you copy those two paragraphs from??? If you go outside of the coverage required by your loan contract, you better be doing it with legal assistance.

The new RESPA servicing rules addressed "comparable coverage" as follows:

"After consideration of the comments received on the alternative, the Bureau believes that the alternative proposal’s requirement regarding comparable coverage would add unnecessary complexity to the regulation. Whether a borrower may or may not benefit from any particular coverage level is dependent on the individual circumstances of the borrower. Further, differences between coverage provided for homeowners’ insurance and force-placed insurance make a comparability determination and complex and difficult process. The Bureau declines to adopt the alternative proposal with respect to obtaining comparable coverage."
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#1817168 - 05/24/13 01:20 PM Re: Force Placed hazard Insurance Coverage jlroberts
midwestriver Offline
Junior Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 37
that was feedback I was provided by counsel. Thanks for your insight under RESPA. Lots of different and conflicting info out there!

Return to Top