Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Thread Options
#1828795 - 06/28/13 03:46 PM Disparate Impact
beegee Offline
Diamond Poster
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,110
South
The article “Disparate Impact in Lending” in the March-April 2013 ABA Bank Compliance issue stated that a bank could face disparate impact if it charges a fee for paper statements and not e-statements because it could have an adverse effect on low-income folks who don't have a computer.

Has a bank been cited for disparate impact because of this?

Return to Top
Fair Lending
#1828804 - 06/28/13 03:52 PM Re: Disparate Impact beegee
rlcarey Online
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,219
Galveston, TX
The statements would have to be related to a loan account and how many low-income folks have lines of credit? I have never heard of this and I think it may have been part of the active imagination of the author. Plus, I have never seen a bank impose a charge (which would be a finance charge) on an open-end credit for the delivery of paper statements to begin with.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#1828811 - 06/28/13 03:56 PM Re: Disparate Impact rlcarey
beegee Offline
Diamond Poster
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,110
South
Thanks - the article states "it's worth noting that disparate impact investigations seem to be going beyond lending practices to other aspects of banking or "fair banking.""

--- but I do not recall hearing of any investigations on paper versus e-statements in regards to disparate impact.

Return to Top
#1828818 - 06/28/13 04:06 PM Re: Disparate Impact beegee
rlcarey Online
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,219
Galveston, TX
disparate impact investigations seem to be going beyond lending practices to other aspects of banking or "fair banking."

If this is true, I would be curious as what they plan to use to prosecute such cases - The Civil Rights Act??? Because, I can't imagine any bank in their right mind rolling over on such a claim without testing it in a court of law, as it would set a precedent for a landslide of civil cases on everything from the offering of deposit products, to the sale of monetary instruments to customers only (as the unbanked might be low-income).

Besides, if they really used the term low-income in the article, it really is not very well written. Last I checked, income level was not a protected basis found in Regulation B for the FHA.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top