Goodness! Good catch on my reference to (h)(1) in my original post. This is going to be a long month. Thank you so much for your patience and your help!
I’m actually looking at the following from the official interpretations to 1026.37:
OPTIONAL ALTERNATIVE CALCULATING CASH TO CLOSE TABLE FOR TRANSACTIONS
WITHOUT A SELLER.
For transactions that do not involve a seller, instead of the table described in paragraph (h)(1)
above, the creditor may alternatively provide, in a separate table, under the master heading
“Closing Cost Details,†under the heading “Calculating Cash to Close,†the total amount of cash or other funds that must be provided by the consumer at consummation with an itemization of that amount into the following component amounts:
i. Loan amount.
The amount disclosed under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, labeled “Loan Amountâ€;
ii. Total closing costs.
The amount disclosed under paragraph (g)(6) of this section, disclosed as a negative number,
labeled “Total Closing Costsâ€;
iii. Payoffs and payments.
The total amount of payoffs and payments to be made to third parties not otherwise disclosed
pursuant to paragraphs (f) and (g) of this section, disclosed as a negative number, labeled
“Total Payoffs and Paymentsâ€;
iv. Cash to or from consumer.
The amount of cash or other funds due from or to the consumer and a statement of whether
the disclosed estimated amount is due from or to the consumer, calculated by the sum of the
amounts disclosed under paragraphs (h)(2)(i) through (iii) of this section, labeled “Cash to
Closeâ€; ….
I guess I was considering the result of the calculation under iv. above to coincide with 37(h)(1)(viii) so if the resulting sum is negative (like in my scenario) then that would indicate the consumer is receiving that amount.
Do I just need to quit thinking and go home?