Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Thread Options
#2098049 - 09/12/16 07:06 PM Numerical Error on Unlimited Tolerance Item
ComplianceRegs Offline
100 Club
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 169
I know how non-numerical clerical errors are addressed, but can't seem to locate anything related to a numerical error on the CD for an item that has unlimited tolerance. For example, an escrow deposit was disclosed correctly on the LE and then inadvertently the initial escrow payment at closing on the CD (Section G) disclosed a larger amount than was actually needed.

First question - If the amounts actually collected were correct and just the amount for escrow payment was disclosed incorrectly on the CD how would this be handled. This doesn't fall under the non-numerical provision since it is obviously a numerical error, but it also isn't a tolerance item. Complete a revised CD just as you would with a non-numerical clerical error within the same 60 day window or would you just leave it and chalk it up to a technical error that cannot be corrected?

Second question - Assume in the same scenario that the incorrect amount were collected for escrow and disclosed. Would you then issue a revised CD showing the proper escrow payment collected at closing and also a cure for the amount collected in excess?
_________________________
CRCM

Return to Top
TRID - TILA/RESPA Integrated Disclosures Rule
#2098053 - 09/12/16 07:11 PM Re: Numerical Error on Unlimited Tolerance Item ComplianceRegs
rlcarey Online
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,388
Galveston, TX
"If the amounts actually collected were correct and just the amount for escrow payment was disclosed incorrectly on the CD how would this be handled. "

How did your cash to close work out if you disclosed the escrow payment amount wrong?
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#2098059 - 09/12/16 07:22 PM Re: Numerical Error on Unlimited Tolerance Item ComplianceRegs
ComplianceRegs Offline
100 Club
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 169
Good point. In the true example the second question is what actually occurred...I was just thinking of a "what if" scenario and didn't even think about the cash to close. So, if the incorrect amount were collected and disclosed for escrow you would issue a revised CD showing the proper escrow payment that should have been disclosed and a cure for the amount collected in excess, correct?
_________________________
CRCM

Return to Top
#2098062 - 09/12/16 07:32 PM Re: Numerical Error on Unlimited Tolerance Item ComplianceRegs
rlcarey Online
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,388
Galveston, TX
Yes.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#2098190 - 09/13/16 03:05 PM Re: Numerical Error on Unlimited Tolerance Item ComplianceRegs
John Burnett Offline
10K Club
John Burnett
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 40,086
Cape Cod
"Cure" might not be the right term here, since this isn't a good-faith estimate violation covered by 1026.19(e)(3)(i) or (ii). Instead, I think you simply refund the over-charge, and because that changes the amount for that charge actually paid by the borrower, you provide an accurate closing disclosure. But I am splitting hairs on the definition of "cure," I realize.
_________________________
John S. Burnett
BankersOnline.com
Fighting for Compliance since 1976
Bankers' Threads User #8

Return to Top
#2100615 - 09/27/16 06:44 PM Re: Numerical Error on Unlimited Tolerance Item ComplianceRegs
perplexed1 Offline
100 Club
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 103
If the amount disclosed was lower than needed, then we would provide a new Closing Disclosure, an Initial Escrow Account Disclosure and give the borrower the option of paying the balance now or having an escrow shortage at analysis time, correct?

Return to Top