Thread Options
|
#804265 - 08/28/07 08:18 PM
Re: Why haven't the liberals jumped all over this
HappyGilmore
|
Power Poster
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,152
|
jamie, I'm sure they're too busy fretting over the fact that (despite the lower poverty rate) the percentage of Americans without health insurance is at a record high.
_________________________
To avoid criticism do nothing, say nothing, be nothing. ~Elbert Hubbard
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#804291 - 08/28/07 08:32 PM
Re: Why haven't the liberals jumped all over this
Hrothgar Geiger
|
10K Club
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 19,854
Pulling people out of the ditc...
|
probably frittered their money away senselessly on food or housing nah, they donated it to the Clintons...see the thread from X that covers that...
_________________________
Providing alternative truths since the invention of time
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#804297 - 08/28/07 08:38 PM
Re: Why haven't the liberals jumped all over this
HappyGilmore
|
Power Poster
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,152
|
Quotes from the NY Times report: Median household income rose slightly for the second consecutive year, by seven-tenths of a percent, but the only statistically significant increase was in white households. The West was the only region of the country to experience a drop in the number and percentage of people in poverty. The percentage of people who received health benefits through an employer declined to 59.7 percent in 2006 from 60.2 percent in 2005. The percentage of people with government-provided health insurance also dropped, to 27 percent from 27.3 percent. Mr. [David] Johnson [chief of the housing and household economic statistics division for the Census Bureau] warned that even as median household incomes climbed slightly last year, both men and women brought home less pay for the third consecutive year.
_________________________
To avoid criticism do nothing, say nothing, be nothing. ~Elbert Hubbard
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#804304 - 08/28/07 08:42 PM
Re: Why haven't the liberals jumped all over this
Becka Marr
|
10K Club
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 34,318
under the Lone Star
|
stats are what you make them, c'mon people you know that!
my household income went way down during this period when my son moved out with his full time pay, so now he is "in poverty" and you know that is a crock
another anectodal example: my dear mother is below the poverty level cause the stats don't cover social security and all the other transfer payments she receives
take all this with a grain of salt
_________________________
Societies that do not find work in and of itself "pleasing to God and requisite to Man," tend to be highly corrupt.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#804314 - 08/28/07 08:47 PM
Re: Why haven't the liberals jumped all over this
Pale Rider
|
Power Poster
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,436
God Bless America
|
ok if I read the numbers right the total number of people with healthcare is 86.7%, leaving people without healthcare at 13.3% Doesn't Michael Moore say it is closer to 44%?
_________________________
Tag you're it!!
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#804322 - 08/28/07 08:52 PM
Re: Why haven't the liberals jumped all over this
kms
|
10K Club
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 19,854
Pulling people out of the ditc...
|
95% of people polled believe that 88.7% of statistics are incorrect
_________________________
Providing alternative truths since the invention of time
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#804323 - 08/28/07 08:54 PM
Re: Why haven't the liberals jumped all over this
kms
|
10K Club
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,395
Jersey Shore
|
ok if I read the numbers right the total number of people with healthcare is 86.7%, leaving people without healthcare at 13.3% Doesn't Michael Moore say it is closer to 44%? No, he said 44 million people, not 44%.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#804326 - 08/28/07 08:56 PM
Re: Why haven't the liberals jumped all over this
Hrothgar Geiger
|
10K Club
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 34,318
under the Lone Star
|
hey what is 44 million divided by 310 million?
you might be surprised
_________________________
Societies that do not find work in and of itself "pleasing to God and requisite to Man," tend to be highly corrupt.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#804327 - 08/28/07 08:57 PM
Re: Why haven't the liberals jumped all over this
Hrothgar Geiger
|
Power Poster
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,152
|
ok if I read the numbers right the total number of people with healthcare is 86.7%, leaving people without healthcare at 13.3% Doesn't Michael Moore say it is closer to 44%? No, he said 44 million people, not 44%. And now it's 47 million.
_________________________
To avoid criticism do nothing, say nothing, be nothing. ~Elbert Hubbard
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#804373 - 08/28/07 09:23 PM
Re: Why haven't the liberals jumped all over this
Becka Marr
|
10K Club
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,846
|
Quotes from the NY Times report: Median household income rose slightly for the second consecutive year, by seven-tenths of a percent, but the only statistically significant increase was in white households. The West was the only region of the country to experience a drop in the number and percentage of people in poverty. The percentage of people who received health benefits through an employer declined to 59.7 percent in 2006 from 60.2 percent in 2005. The percentage of people with government-provided health insurance also dropped, to 27 percent from 27.3 percent. Mr. [David] Johnson [chief of the housing and household economic statistics division for the Census Bureau] warned that even as median household incomes climbed slightly last year, both men and women brought home less pay for the third consecutive year. The old joke is, of course, that the NYT would run the headline: "World to End - Women, Minorities Hardest Hit". In that light, I love the part about how the only "significant" increase was in white households. On another point, shouldn't it be a good thing that there are fewer people being provided government healthcare? This reminds me of the commercials I hear advertising WIC benefits. I'm paying taxes to advertise welfare?
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#804390 - 08/28/07 09:28 PM
Re: Why haven't the liberals jumped all over this
Jokerman
|
Power Poster
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,152
|
I love the part about how the only "significant" increase was in white households. Yes, and I didn't even include the bit about the poverty rate dropping for Hispanics but remaining statistically unchanged for other racial/ethnic groups. On another point, shouldn't it be a good thing that there are fewer people being provided government healthcare? Yes - theoretically - if it meant that they were able to obtain healthcare through employment, or some other means. (But I take it that is not the case here.)
_________________________
To avoid criticism do nothing, say nothing, be nothing. ~Elbert Hubbard
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#804394 - 08/28/07 09:30 PM
Re: Why haven't the liberals jumped all over this
Jokerman
|
Diamond Poster
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,436
|
I love the part about how the only "significant" increase was in white households. It says "statistically significant". That is a mathematical term with a specific meaning.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#804402 - 08/28/07 09:37 PM
Re: Why haven't the liberals jumped all over this
Yossarian
|
10K Club
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,846
|
Yes, yes, confidence intervals and such. It's all very lovely.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#804421 - 08/28/07 09:57 PM
Re: Why haven't the liberals jumped all over this
Hrothgar Geiger
|
Power Poster
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,487
|
I think jamie may be a free-market kind of guy. If people with rising incomes don't have health insurance, it's their own fault, probably frittered their money away senselessly on food or housing. Or that new Gibson Les Paul!
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#804490 - 08/28/07 10:49 PM
Re: Why haven't the liberals jumped all over this
Hrothgar Geiger
|
Power Poster
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,436
God Bless America
|
"Quick PR, what's 47 million divided by 310 million? You might be surprised.... "
ok 6.8% Really that doesnt seem as bad then...(I know I know anyone without health insurance has only this admin to blame)
_________________________
Tag you're it!!
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#804491 - 08/28/07 10:54 PM
Re: Why haven't the liberals jumped all over this
kms
|
Power Poster
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,152
|
How do you come up with 6.8%? 47/310 = .15
_________________________
To avoid criticism do nothing, say nothing, be nothing. ~Elbert Hubbard
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#804559 - 08/29/07 10:38 AM
Re: Why haven't the liberals jumped all over this
HappyGilmore
|
10K Club
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 40,766
Turnpike Exit 10
|
I am sure it is a mistake. ::sticking out tongue::
_________________________
Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - Mark Twain
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#804650 - 08/29/07 01:37 PM
Re: Why haven't the liberals jumped all over this
Retired DQ
|
10K Club
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 34,318
under the Lone Star
|
out of the 47 million without health insurance:
11 million are eligible for government programs like SCHIP but chose not to participate
15 million are illegal aliens
and another 12 million make more than $60 thousand a year, all this according to a BC/BS study
so that leaves what, less than 10 million; and we need universal health care for this number?
what person in America cannot receive health care when needed?
_________________________
Societies that do not find work in and of itself "pleasing to God and requisite to Man," tend to be highly corrupt.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#804696 - 08/29/07 02:17 PM
Re: Why haven't the liberals jumped all over this
Pale Rider
|
10K Club
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,395
Jersey Shore
|
The Blue Cross/Blue Shield study is interesting, in a "it's amazing what you can do with numbers and the right verb choices" sort of way. 11 million eligible for CHIP. Well, 'eligible for CHIP' means 'child under 18' (and there are income guidelines.) Darn those children for not enrolling themselves... . The most you can say is that 11 million eligible children are not enrolled in CHIP. It takes a certain philosophical bent to turn 'are not enrolled' into 'chose not to participate.' Similarly, asserting that some folks have a particular income level and therefore could have health insurance assumes more facts than the study presents. Admittedly, they probably wasted their money on food and shelter instead of health insurance.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#804697 - 08/29/07 02:17 PM
Re: Why haven't the liberals jumped all over this
Pale Rider
|
Diamond Poster
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,168
Texas
|
what person in America cannot receive health care when needed?
The person like my brother who was self employed, with a 2 kids to support, who had integrity and wasn't eligible for medical assitance because he wasn't a pregnant woman or a child, and couldn't find a doctor who would see him without insurance and ended up in the ER when his symptoms were so bad that it was too late to save his life.
_________________________
Work less, play more.....why not????
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#804877 - 08/29/07 03:46 PM
Re: Why haven't the liberals jumped all over this
kms
|
Power Poster
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,152
|
Sorry Becka, I was really tired and went the wrong way with it. Oh, no worries. lol
_________________________
To avoid criticism do nothing, say nothing, be nothing. ~Elbert Hubbard
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
|
|