I would mention she would need to file police report
While I understand in this case the customer did file a police report, Reg E 1005.11(b) only requires that the customer provide their name, enough information to identify their account number and why they believe an error exists. We can ask for, but not require a police report. Examiners have been handing out UDAAP citations for adding extra requirements to Reg E notification requirements such as police reports, copies of sales receipts, and merchant contact. If a customer refuses to file a police report, we still must investigate and cannot deny a claim on the basis of their refusal to file. As the financial victim, we can advise them that we will be filing a police report in an attempt to recover the funds from the thief and sometimes that will cause folks to voluntarily withdraw claims.
Back to the question at hand:
Unless you can demonstrate that your customer provided the access device (ID and Password) to the grandson, the transfers would be considered EFT errors and the bank would be liable for the unauthorized transfers. Based on the dollar amount and the fact that you can identify a subject, be sure to refer this matter to your BSA Department for investigation into a possible SAR.
_________________________
Sola Gratia, Sola Fides, Sola Scriptura, Solus Christus, Soli Deo Gloria!
www.tcaregs.com