Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Thread Options
#2247819 - 01/19/21 07:42 PM ACH Return
Compliance NABW Offline
Diamond Poster
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,669
Bank A (RDFI) requests authorization of transaction from Bank B (ODFI) and a late return due to a fraud situation. It has been about 120 days since the transaction in question took place and funds are long gone. Bank B needs to provide the transaction authorization, but are they required to return funds to the RDFI so long after the transaction took place?

Return to Top
Deposits and Payments
#2247828 - 01/19/21 08:56 PM Re: ACH Return Compliance NABW
rlcarey Offline
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 83,371
Galveston, TX
If you are outside of your 60 day window - the transaction is done as far as ACH returns are concerned, is it not?
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top
#2247829 - 01/19/21 08:59 PM Re: ACH Return Compliance NABW
John Burnett Offline
10K Club
John Burnett
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 40,086
Cape Cod
Bank B could send back the funds if they were able to recoup from their customer even after 60 days, if Bank A provided a hold harmless agreement, but they aren't under any obligation to do so.

That said, however, under Nacha rules, Bank B warrantied that the transaction was properly authorized by the Originator and the Receiver. The warranty is given to each RDFI and ACH Operator. That warranty is valid for a period provided by the statute of limitations on contracts in the state of Bank B's domicile. If Bank A believes there was no authorization or that the authorization was not valid, the RDFI can attempt to recover from the ODFI on a claim for breach of contract during that period.
Last edited by John Burnett; 01/19/21 09:02 PM. Reason: tweaked
_________________________
John S. Burnett
BankersOnline.com
Fighting for Compliance since 1976
Bankers' Threads User #8

Return to Top

Moderator:  John Burnett