Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Thread Options
#2224110 - 10/22/19 01:20 PM Reg Z Section 35 and 43 Question
parker1962 Offline
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 32
For clarity, are second homes permitted to be HPMLs? (Meaning, it is allowed for the APR on a second home to be higher than APOR + 1.5?) Both Sections seem to only reference dwellings, which don't appear to specifically rule out second homes. Interpreting this as the APR on second homes cannot exceed the limit.

Return to Top
Lending Compliance
#2224112 - 10/22/19 01:26 PM Re: Reg Z Section 35 and 43 Question parker1962
Skittles Online
10K Club
Skittles
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 13,965
TN
This is a snippet of the regulation. You can see it states 'principal' dwelling.

a) Definitions. For purposes of this section:

(1) "Higher-priced mortgage loan" means a closed-end consumer credit transaction secured by the consumer's principal dwelling with an annual percentage rate that exceeds the average prime offer rate for a comparable transaction as of the date the interest rate is set:
_________________________
My Opinions Only

Return to Top
#2224114 - 10/22/19 01:41 PM Re: Reg Z Section 35 and 43 Question Skittles
parker1962 Offline
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 32
So it is correct to assume that second homes cannot exceed the limit?

Return to Top
#2224118 - 10/22/19 02:07 PM Re: Reg Z Section 35 and 43 Question parker1962
Skittles Online
10K Club
Skittles
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 13,965
TN
My opinion is that there is no limit since this portion of the regulation doesn't apply to second homes.
_________________________
My Opinions Only

Return to Top
#2224121 - 10/22/19 02:41 PM Re: Reg Z Section 35 and 43 Question parker1962
Dan Persfull Offline
10K Club
Dan Persfull
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 47,533
Bloomington, IN
From 1026.35:

(a) Definitions. For purposes of this section:

(1) "Higher-priced mortgage loan" means a closed-end consumer credit transaction secured by the consumer's principal dwelling

Second or vacation homes would not be subject to 1026.35.

From 1026.43

(a) Scope. This section applies to any consumer credit transaction that is secured by a dwelling, as defined in § 1026.2(a)(19), including any real property attached to a dwelling, other than:

(1) A home equity line of credit subject to § 1026.40;

(2) A mortgage transaction secured by a consumer's interest in a timeshare plan, as defined in 11 U.S.C. 101(53(D)); or

b) Definitions. For purposes of this section:

(1) Covered transaction means a consumer credit transaction that is secured by a dwelling, as defined in § 1026.2(a)(19), including any real property attached to a dwelling, other than a transaction exempt from coverage under paragraph (a) of this section.

Any consumer purpose loan secured by a dwelling is subject to 1026.43 unless it meets one of the specified exemptions.
_________________________
The opinions expressed are mine and they are not to be taken as legal advice.

Return to Top
#2224123 - 10/22/19 02:56 PM Re: Reg Z Section 35 and 43 Question parker1962
Compliance NABW Offline
Diamond Poster
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,669
Cannot exceed the limit is not the best way to look at it. If the limit is exceeded and a loan is an HPML as a result, then you just have to deal with the fact that it has an HPML status. But, to further bolster what Skittles is getting at, check out Section 2.3 of the following: https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201603_cfpb_tila-hpml-escrow_compliance-guide.pdf. As noted in the definition to be an HPML it has to relate to the principal dwelling of the consumer, so second homes would not be subject to the HPML requirements in Reg. Z.

(1) “Higher-priced mortgage loan” means a closed-end consumer credit transaction secured by the consumer's *principal dwelling* . . .
Last edited by Compliance NABW; 10/22/19 02:57 PM.
Return to Top

Moderator:  Andy_Z