Having a debate on whether the terminology "finance charge" must be used when describing certain fees in the HELOC account opening disclosure (Note). Historically, prepaid finance charges such as flood, tax service and settlement are separately described in the note as "Finance charges". For example, in a Laser Pro HELOC Credit Agreement and Disclosure, these fees are shown in the paragraph heading "You also agree to pay FINANCE CHARGES, not calculated by applying a Periodic Rate, as set forth below:", then items such as flood and tax service fees are listed as "Additional Finance Charges". Then later a few paragraphs below, other fees such as appraisal, survey, etc. are shown in the paragraph heading "Conditions Under Which Other Charges May be Imposed..." then items such as appraisal and survey are listed as "Security Interest Charges".
The question being posed is whether items such as flood and tax service even need to be described as "finance charges" and separately itemized from the other charges. I have always understood that it must be done the way I described above. My support for this is in 12 CFR 1026.5(a)(2)(ii) - For home-equity plans subject to § 1026.40, the terms finance charge and annual percentage rate, when required to be disclosed with a corresponding amount or percentage rate, shall be more conspicuous than any other required disclosure."
It seems to me the only way to comply with 12 CFR 1026.5(a)(2)(ii), is you would have to have the items considered finance charges listed separately and labeled as FINANCE CHARGES in the note.
Am I interpreting this correctly?