The poles hold the frame that holds the trusses that holds the roof. The term "load bearing" is not part of the definition of a rigid wall. My understanding has always been that if the walls are more than 1' up from the dirt, it's not considered a 'wall'. Not going all the way to the top may not disqualify it from coverage.
Your best bet is to contact NFIP on that one!
I'm going to use myself as an example of walls that don't go all the way to the roof, but are most definitely rigid. In my feedroom of my barn, I built walls that may be better built than my house. smile They do not technically go all the way to the ceiling because the ceiling is on a slant. Used to, I left that 'slice' open. More recently, when I redid the room, I cut plywood to fill that space. This isn't much different than a house with a vaulted ceiling. Your walls do not reach to the ceiling much less the roof in many areas. They simply go to the flatline where your sheetrock ends and the ceiling begins. Many are not load bearing, but they are rigid.
Load bearing, I believe, primarily comes into play when you are looking at attached buildings/appurtenances rules
Last edited by RR Joker; 06/20/19 01:12 PM.
_________________________
My opinion only. Not legal advice.
Say you'll haunt me - Stone Sour