Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Learn More - Click Here!

New Reply
Post Icon
Smilies Insert Link Insert Email Link Insert Image Link Insert Media Tag List Bold Italic Underline Strike-through Spoiler Quote Font Color Fonts Font Size
Make textarea smaller
Make textarea bigger
Post Options

HTML is disabled.
UBBCode is enabled.
Poll Manager (Total Polls: 0)




In Response To:
Thread Starter: West Coast Comp
Title: Re: Only using a relative as a co-signer

If you allow marriage to establish relationship, and you do not allow unrelated co-habitants to co-sign, then it looks to me that you are likely to discriminate based on marital status.
An unmarried couple live in the same house…no co-singer permitted they are not related…They get married, they are now related, co-signer permitted. If you change how you treat them simply on the basis of a marital status (which is the only difference in this example)…How is this not discrimination based on marital status?
I think having a relationship requirement will lead to discrimination based on marriage as marriage effects relationship.