CTR or no CTR

Posted By: trainer82

CTR or no CTR - 06/02/08 01:37 AM

Customer A withdraws $10000 from her savings account in cash. Later the same business day, using a $100 bill, she deposits $60 into her checking account, receiving $40 cash back. Does the $40 cash back need to be aggregated with the $10000 from the savings withdrawal and a CTR filed?
Posted By: #Just Jay

Re: CTR or no CTR - 06/02/08 01:44 PM

IMO, no.
Posted By: WonderWoman

Re: CTR or no CTR - 06/02/08 04:21 PM

*ditto* to Just Jay

But I would definitely put this person on my radar ...
Posted By: Deena

Re: CTR or no CTR - 06/02/08 06:27 PM

I'm curious as to why you wouldn't file a CTR. Didn't the customer technically walk out of the bank with more than $10,000 in cash when the two transactions are aggregated?
Posted By: #Just Jay

Re: CTR or no CTR - 06/02/08 07:53 PM

I would "technically" they walked out with $9640.

I do not view the $40 cash back out of the $100 as a withdrawl nor as a cach exchange. I see a $10k WD, and a $60 deposit.

I can see why some may consider the $40 cashback as a cash exchange out, but I do not.

Which ever way you choose to treat the $40, just be consistent with it going forward.
Posted By: I Wear Many Hats

Re: CTR or no CTR - 06/02/08 08:05 PM

Our system would aggregate this as:

$10,000 cash out + $40 Cash out = $10,040
minus your $60 cash in - = $9980 - total cash out -

not reportable - but kind of odd.....
Posted By: CantBeShocked

Re: CTR or no CTR - 06/02/08 08:48 PM

I do not think that you are supposed to "net" out the transactions. You add deposits, add withdrawals - if either one is reportable, you report such amount on a CTR.
Posted By: trainer82

Re: CTR or no CTR - 06/03/08 01:05 AM

As it turned out, the teller who processed the second transaction ($40 cash back from a deposit) was prompted by the system to complete the CTR. Our central office said it wasn't necessary.
Thanks to all for responding.
Posted By: TXBSA

Re: CTR or no CTR - 06/03/08 03:31 PM

I would say it is necessary. You do not know for sure that the $100 was from the cash earlier in the day. She left the first time with $10000.00 and the second time with $40. I would say yes on the CTR.
Posted By: Znatok

Re: CTR or no CTR - 06/03/08 03:49 PM

Definately CTR.
Posted By: John Burnett

Re: CTR or no CTR - 06/05/08 09:15 PM

I'll add my voice to the chorus that says you absolutely do not subtract the cash in from the cash outs to arrive at a net number. That's a strict no.

I could go either way on whether the $40 "change" is additional cash out. The odds of coming up with a similar scenario are slim, but I suggest deciding how your bank should have handled the day's transactions, and be consistent in the future.
Posted By: John Burnett

Re: CTR or no CTR - 06/05/08 09:17 PM

For what it's worth, an additional thought: While thinking about odds, you should ask yourself whether the odds are greater of having this scenario questioned by an examiner if you file the CTR for $10,040 or don't file. And, if questioned, which option would be easier to defend. If you consider those questions honestly and practically, I bet you'd file.