Comments on "ability to repay" reopened

Posted By: John Burnett

Comments on "ability to repay" reopened - 05/31/12 08:34 PM

From BOL's 5/31/12 Top Stories:

  • LATE-BREAKING: Bureau reopens comments on "ability-to-repay"
    The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (Bureau) has announced the reopening of the comment period on the Federal Reserve Board's May 11, 2011 proposed rulemaking under Dodd-Frank Act amendments to the Truth in Lending Act. The proposal would require creditors to determine a consumer's ability to repay a mortgage loan and would set minimum underwriting standards for home mortgages. The Bureau is specifically requesting comments on additional information it has obtained on the performance of securitized mortgage loans and on certain related matters. The comment period will end July 9, 2012.

  • Posted By: Retired DQ

    Re: Comments on "ability to repay" reopened - 06/01/12 10:44 AM

    http://www.americanbanker.com/issues/177_105/mortgage-ability-repay-qualified-borrower-QM-1049788-1.html?ET=americanbanker:e10964:1368791a:&st=email&utm_source=editorial&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ABLA_Daily_Briefing_053112

    Implementation will be at the end of 2012...

    This whole rule is going to wreak havoc on consumers' ability to purchase a home in high priced areas, such as NJ. eek
    Posted By: Kathleen O. Blanchard

    Re: Comments on "ability to repay" reopened - 06/01/12 11:24 AM

    A state that has affordable housing as a critical need!
    Posted By: Sinatra Fan

    Re: Comments on "ability to repay" reopened - 06/01/12 12:45 PM

    Originally Posted By: John Burnett
    The proposal would require creditors to determine a consumer's ability to repay a mortgage loan


    Can't argue with that. Great googly moogly, if a lender isn't and hasn't been doing that all along, he's got no business lending!
    Posted By: Retired DQ

    Re: Comments on "ability to repay" reopened - 06/01/12 01:17 PM

    From what I understand is the the QM would require a 20% down payment... eek
    Posted By: DD Regs

    Re: Comments on "ability to repay" reopened - 06/01/12 01:35 PM

    Admittidly, I haven't read the rule yet, just different commentaries, but isn't the QM standard for sellable loans? You would still have the inhouse portfolio option.
    Posted By: AuditorK

    Re: Comments on "ability to repay" reopened - 06/08/12 10:47 PM

    Originally Posted By: DD Regs
    Admittidly, I haven't read the rule yet, just different commentaries, but isn't the QM standard for sellable loans? You would still have the inhouse portfolio option.


    From what I've read, heard about, interpreted - it seems the QM standards would create repercussions on porfolio loans as well.
    Posted By: Retired DQ

    Re: Comments on "ability to repay" reopened - 06/11/12 02:07 PM

    Maybe some relief from the CARD act as well:

    http://www.cutimes.com/2012/06/07/cfpb-will-consider-reversing-card-acts-ability-to?ref=hp