Skip to content

Finance Charge Violations

Answered by: 

Question: 
In a R/E transaction (construction loan) if the APR is understated and the finance charge is overstated (due to improperly calculating the estimated interest on the entire balance method) is the violation reimbursable? In reviewing 226.18 and 226.22 it appears that if the finance charge disclosed is greater than the amount required to be disclosed then it is considered accurate and no reimbursement is required. Is this correct?
Answer: 

I believe you will have to look at the APR and Finance Charge separately. You should be correct on the overstatement no longer being a violation. The APR however, will have to be reviewed.

I would recommend reviewing the March/April 1998 ABA Compliance Magazine. The article, Compliance Alert: Restitution Redux: The TILA Reimbursement Rules After The Rodash Amendments by Alan J. Dombrow, CRCM, and Walter E. Zalenski will prove useful.

First published on BankersOnline.com 10/1/01

First published on 10/01/2001

Filed under: 
Filed under compliance as: 
Filed under lending as: 

Banker Store View All

From training, policies, forms, and publications, to office products and occasional gifts, it’s available here:

Banker Store

hot right now

image description

Looking for effective, convenient training on a particular subject?

BOL Learning Connect offers more than 200 courses ON-DEMAND or on CD ROM from AML to Reg Z and every topic in between.

Search Topics