Skip to content

Lender Can't Fund - UDAP?

Answered by: 

Question: 
If a lender has a borrower sign loan documents but has some liquidity issues that extend the funding beyond the rescission period, would that be a UDAP violation? In this example, say the lender expected liquidity to come in from a trade before the rescission was up on the loan. However it was held up for a week. The loan will fund, but a week late. The property is in California if that matters.
Answer: 

All I can say is WOW! A lender that cannot fund a legal obligation because of liquidity issues it a bankrupt lender. The borrower should sue them for breach of contract and immediately report them to their regulatory agency.

First published on 03/05/2023

Filed under: 

Search Topics