Skip to content

Loan Taking Land As Collateral But Not Mobile Home

Answered by: 

We have a loan where we are taking the land as collateral but NOT the mobile homes on the land. The property is in a flood zone but should we require flood insurance since we have no interest in the mobile homes?

The land is not insurable for flood insurance. Since you are not taking the mobile homes as collateral, you have no requirement to have flood insurance coverage in place. So from a regulatory perspective, flood insurance would not be a requirement.

Now, let's talk about credit risk. Does your borrower own the mobile homes and derive rental income from those that will serve as a source of repayment for the loan? If the answer to that is yes, you may very well want to require that your borrower maintain flood insurance on the mobile homes as a matter of prudent underwriting for the loan.

First published on 06/02/2014

Filed under: 
Filed under lending as: 

Banker Store View All

From training, policies, forms, and publications, to office products and occasional gifts, it’s available here:

Banker Store

hot right now

image description

Looking for effective, convenient training on a particular subject?

BOL Learning Connect offers more than 200 courses ON-DEMAND or on CD ROM from AML to Reg Z and every topic in between.

Search Topics