Answer by Ken Golliher: Sec. 229.33 Notice of nonpayment.
(a) Requirement. If a paying bank determines not to pay a check in the amount of $2,500 or more...
You are the payee, not the "paying bank." Regulation CC's instruction does not apply to you.
Your motivation for promptly notifying the drawer of the bad check would come from enlightened self interest, not law or regulation.
Answer by Randy Carey: Ken - I had the same gut feeling, but technically the auditor might be on to something.
The definition of a depository bank (229.2(o)) includes: "A bank also is considered a depositary bank with respect to checks it receives as payee. For example, a bank is a depositary bank with respect to checks it receives for loan repayment, even though these checks are not deposited in an account at the bank."
and 299.33(d) requires: "This paragraph requires a depositary bank to notify its customer of nonpayment upon receipt of a returned check or notice of nonpayment, regardless of the amount of the check or notice."
Is this a new gotcha that someone dreamed up??? I have never heard of it before I followed this through the regulation, but it appears to be an accurate assessment of the requirement.
Answer by Ken Golliher: Ditto.
I'm taken aback, but assume my "enlightened self interest" would assure that I met the timing requirements of the notice. However, I'm not certain I would have automatically complied with the content requirements. My "notice" would have been more focused on the "Whattayagonna do about it" issue.
First published on BankersOnline.com 6/24/13