Skip to content

Reg DD Disclosure Mistake on Compounded Interest

Question: 
One of my banks just realized that the Reg DD disclosure for their savings accounts has stated that the interest is compounded monthly when in reality it is compounding quarterly. That disclosure has been corrected but does the bank owe restitution to all savings customers?
Answer: 

Answer by Randy Carey: There are no regulatory restitution provisions in Regulation DD. You have a breach of contract and it will be up to the bank to determine what is the right course of action.

Answer: 

Answer by Richard Insley: "Restitution" isn't exactly what's under consideration. In this case, you haven't taken money from customers improperly. Instead, you have cheated them out of interest payments your contract promised. I have seen depositors become very irritated about the smallest of errors in interest calculation and payment, so class action litigation is a serious possibility. Regardless of the regulators' lack of a TIS-specific corrective action policy, situations like this should be within the scope of their UDAAP rules.

I view this as a low-cost opportunity to be seen doing the right thing. With interest rates at rock bottom, the difference in compounding frequency will produce very little additional interest per account. As a demonstration of good faith, I would calculate the amounts due, round each one up to the next highest dollar, credit the accounts, and send out a letter of explanation.

First published on BankersOnline.com 12/17/12

First published on 12/17/2012

Filed under: 
Filed under operations as: 

Search Topics