Thread Options
|
#116705 - 09/23/03 07:15 PM
Ofac tracking
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Traditionally we have used Chex System for Ofac checking when opening an account and would receive notification within 24 hours if we had a name match. We will change to a new system soon "Ofac Tracker" that will give us an instant notification if there is an OFAC match and I am not sure what the new account person should do, open the account or not open the account?
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#116708 - 09/23/03 08:32 PM
Re: Ofac tracking
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I thought you were supposed to open the account so you could freeze the funds.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#116710 - 09/23/03 09:32 PM
Re: Ofac tracking
|
Platinum Poster
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 730
Maine
|
We use Chexsystems or NCPS when opening new deposit accounts. If there is a "hit" we usually aren't notified soon enough to refuse to open the account. That is OK with us because 1) OFAC could instruct us to freeze the funds rather than refuse to open the account and 2) we don't want to put our new accounts person in the awkward position of telling a possible drug dealer/terrorist/general bad guy face-to-face that we won't open the account because we think he's a drug dealer/terrorist/general bad guy. I say even if the info is available immediately, open the account anyway and then do your legwork to confirm. Most of the "hits" don't turn out to be real matches anyway.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#116711 - 09/25/03 04:19 PM
Re: Ofac tracking
|
Gold Star
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 494
PA
|
Quote:
and 2) we don't want to put our new accounts person in the awkward position of telling a possible drug dealer/terrorist/general bad guy face-to-face that we won't open the account because we think he's a drug dealer/terrorist/general bad guy. I say even if the info is available immediately, open the account anyway and then do your legwork to confirm.
If I remember past posts correctly, many of us have the same attitude about OFAC and deposit accounts. However, our regional OCC office just quoted from the OFAC Q&A that "A U.S. bank cannot open an account for a person named on the SDN list. This is a prohibited service..."
Even the examiner said she had thought that we should open, then freeze, deposit accounts.
We wrote our CIP procedures and trained with this understanding - gotta do some serious scrambling, unless one of you can find a contradictory cite from OFAC.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#116712 - 09/25/03 08:23 PM
Re: Ofac tracking
|
Diamond Poster
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,362
Colorado
|
Could you consider the account "provisionally" opened until you have completed all your checks? I still think OFAC would rather have the money.
_________________________
Opinions are mine and not necessarily my employer's.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#116713 - 09/26/03 01:23 PM
Re: Ofac tracking
|
Gold Star
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 494
PA
|
Quote:
Could you consider the account "provisionally" opened until you have completed all your checks? I still think OFAC would rather have the money.
Great Blue - I really wish it were that way, but the OFAC Q&A & our OCC were pretty clear. Anyone else care to weigh in? Especially if you can quote sources that indicate we should open, then freeze...
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#116714 - 09/26/03 04:36 PM
Re: Ofac tracking
|
Diamond Poster
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,362
Colorado
|
Here are a couple of excerpts from OFAC's FAQ . The answer to the first question clearly indicates that the check must occur prior to account opening, but the answer to the 2nd says " The important thing is not to conclude transactions before the analysis is completed. " I think this is what I interpolated in my thinking into meaning you could consider the account not truly opened until you had completed your checks. " What do I do if a person tries to open an account and the person's name is on OFAC's SDN list? Do I open the account and then block the funds?
A U.S. bank cannot open an account for a person named on the SDN list. This is a prohibited service. However, you should pay careful attention to be sure the person trying to open the account is the same person as the one named on OFAC's list. In many cases you may get a "false positive," where the name is similar to a target's name, but the rest of the information provided by the applicant does not match the descriptor information on OFAC's SDN list. If the bank does come into the possession or control of any property in which a blocked person has an interest, it is obligated to block that property. In other words, if you receive an application to open an account from a person who matches the information on the SDN list, together with an opening deposit, you are obligated to block the funds. The same is true for other banking transactions. If, for example, a customer asks if he or she is allowed to send money to a relative's account with Rafidain Bank in Iraq, the bank can say "no, that's illegal." If, on the other hand, a bank receives instructions from its customer to debit his or her account and send the funds to Rafidain Bank, the bank must act on the instructions by blocking the funds which contain a future interest of the Iraqi SDN bank. You might think of the analogy of a bouncing ball. Once the ball starts moving, you must stop it if it comes into your possession. [09-10-02]
Does a financial institution need to scan names against OFAC's list of targets upon account opening or can it wait for 24 hours to receive a report from its software vendor on whether or not there is a hit?
There is no legal or regulatory requirement to use software or to scan. There is a requirement, however, not to violate the law by doing business with a target or failing to block property. OFAC realizes that financial institutions use software that does not always provide an instantaneous response and may require some analysis to determine if a customer is indeed an SDN. The important thing is not to conclude transactions before the analysis is completed. [09-10-02]"
_________________________
Opinions are mine and not necessarily my employer's.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
#116717 - 09/27/03 08:27 AM
Re: Ofac tracking
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 70
VT, USA
|
Quote:
We use the OFAC Tracker as well. Every new account, loan, trust account must be verified through the system prior to the account being established. The employee must print out the results of the search and attach it to the account documentation to ensure compliance with the OFAC requirements.
Now to the controversial issue about opening the account vs. refusing the account. We have talked with our employees and trained them to assess the situation, if they ever have a situation where they might feel that it would put any employee in jeopardy, they are to open the account and let the customer leave. I will take a fine by the government over risking the chance that harm may come to one of our employees. Case closed.
AMEN! Same here.
|
Return to Top
|
|
|
|
|
|