Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Thread Options
#179364 - 04/13/04 07:48 PM 1003 APPLICATION QUESTION
Anonymous
Unregistered

On the 1003 Application the borrower indicated property would be owner occupied. However,other documentation in the file points to the fact that the loan is an investment property including the the Declarations Section VIII item m of the 1003. Would this be subject to the Rescission Rules or is this considered to a violation? Thank you in advance.

Return to Top
Lending Compliance
#179365 - 04/13/04 08:33 PM Re: 1003 APPLICATION QUESTION
Dan Persfull Offline
10K Club
Dan Persfull
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 47,680
Bloomington, IN
I've seen this more than once and you have to determine the true use of the property, that will dictate the regulatory disclosure requirement.
_________________________
The opinions expressed are mine and they are not to be taken as legal advice.

Return to Top
#179366 - 04/13/04 08:42 PM Re: 1003 APPLICATION QUESTION
Sinatra Fan Offline
Power Poster
Sinatra Fan
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,568
New Jersey
If we are at all doubtful that the applicant(s) will occupy the subject property, we require a separate signed "Affidavit of Intent to Occupy." Sometimes we find that the applicant simply checked the wrong box on the front of the 1003. Sometimes we discover that the applicant didn't think we would catch it. And sometimes we learn that the applicant(s) will not occupy.
_________________________
Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things. Peter Drucker

Return to Top

Moderator:  Andy_Z