Top Story Compliance Related

The Securities and Exchange Commission has announced it has charged audit firm BF Borgers CPA PC and its owner, Benjamin F. Borgers, with deliberate and systemic failures to comply with Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) standards in its audits and reviews incorporated in more than 1,500 SEC filings from January 2021 through June 2023. The SEC also charged the Respondents with falsely representing to their clients that the firm’s work would comply with PCAOB standards; fabricating audit documentation to make it appear that the firm’s work did comply with PCAOB standards; and falsely stating in audit reports included in more than 500 public company SEC filings that the firm’s audits complied with PCAOB standards.

To settle the SEC’s charges, BF Borgers agreed to pay a $12 million civil penalty, and Benjamin Borgers agreed to pay a $2 million civil penalty. Both Respondents also agreed to permanent suspensions from appearing and practicing before the Commission as accountants, effective immediately.

• SEC Order

The FDIC, OCC and Federal Reserve Board have jointly announced their issuance of a guide to support community banks in managing risks presented by third-party relationships.

Third-party relationships present varied risks that community banks are expected to appropriately identify, assess, monitor, and control to ensure that their activities are performed in a safe and sound manner and in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. These laws and regulations include, but are not limited to, those designed to protect consumers and those addressing financial crimes.

The guide offers potential considerations, resources, and examples through each stage of the third-party relationship and may be a helpful resource for community banks. While the guide illustrates the principles discussed in the third-party risk management guidance issued by the agencies in June 2023, it is not a substitute for that guidance.

• Third-Party Risk Managment: A Guide for Community Banks
• OCC Bulletin 2024-11
• FIL-20-2024

The FDIC has released its May 2024 list of banks examined for CRA compliance. Of the 56 banks listed, one headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah, that "focuses its lending efforts on financing tiny homes" and "did not lend in its assessment area" received a "Substantial Noncompliance" rating. Another bank, headquartered in Rhinebeck, New York, received a "Needs to Improve" rating. Fifty-two of the banks earned "Satisfactory" ratings.

We congratulate First Bank of the Lake, Osage Beach, Missouri, and Union Bank, Morrisville, Vermont, for receiving evaluation ratings of "Outstanding."

Yesterday, the Department of the Treasury reported that OFAC has designated five individuals for helping U.S.-designated Hizballah money exchanger Hassan Moukalled (Moukalled) and his company, CTEX Exchange, evade sanctions and facilitate illicit activities in support of Hizballah. These individuals, including two co-founders of CTEX Exchange and two of Moukalled’s sons, operate two companies in Lebanon and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) that were concurrently designated. Individuals and entities targeted yesterday were designated pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13224, as amended, which targets terrorist groups, their supporters, and those who aid acts of terrorism.

For the names and identification information of the designated parties, see the May 2, 2024, BankersOnline OFAC Update.

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) yesterday released a list of CRA performance evaluations that became public in April. The list contains only national banks, federal savings associations, and insured federal branches of foreign banks that have received ratings. The possible ratings are outstanding, satisfactory, needs to improve, and substantial noncompliance.

Of the 13 evaluations made public in April, one located in Los Angeles, California, is rated needs to improve, 11 are rated satisfactory, and one is rated outstanding. We congratulate MidFirst Bank, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, on its outstanding CRA rating.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency has announced that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the Enterprises) published new Reconsideration of Value (ROV) policies after months of collaboration with FHFA and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Federal Housing Administration. A Reconsideration of Value is a request to an appraiser to re-assess the appraised value of a property due to potential appraisal reporting deficiencies or inappropriate selection of comparable properties, or based upon additional information the appraiser should consider.

In June 2023, as part of the Interagency Task Force on Property Appraisal and Valuation Equity, FHFA and HUD established a working group to develop consistent ROV standards. The Enterprises’ new policies provide clear requirements for lenders to disclose and outline the ROV process for consumers, standardize communication to appraisers, and establish ROV response expectations. Lenders will also be required to refer appraisers to local, state, and federal agencies for violations of anti-discrimination laws.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development, through the FHA, announced a new FHA requirement for lenders participating in its Single Family program that will enable borrowers to request a re-assessment of the appraised value of their property if they believe that the appraisal was inaccurate or biased.

• Fannie Mae Selling Guide Announcement
• Freddie Mac Bulletin
• FHA ROV Mortgagee Letter

Yesterday, the Treasury Department announced actions to further degrade Russia’s ability to sustain its war machine, continuing a multilateral campaign to limit the Kremlin’s revenue and access to the materiel it needs to prosecute its illegal war against Ukraine. Yesterday’s actions target Russia’s military-industrial base and chemical and biological weapons programs as well as companies and individuals in third countries that help Russia acquire key inputs for weapons or defense-related production. Nearly 300 targets were sanctioned by Treasury and the Department of State, including sanctions on dozens of actors that have enabled Russia to acquire technology and equipment from abroad.

In addition to the nearly 200 targets sanctioned by the Department of the Treasury, the Department of State has imposed sanctions on over 80 entities and individuals that are engaged in sanctions evasion and circumvention or are related to Russia’s chemical and biological weapons programs and defense industrial base. The Department of State also targeted Russia’s revenue generation through its future energy, metals, and mining production and sanctioning additional individuals in connection with the death of opposition leader and anticorruption activist Aleksey Navalny. For more information on State actions, see the Department of State Fact Sheet.

Today’s action includes nearly 60 targets located in Azerbaijan, Belgium, the PRC, Russia, Slovakia, Türkiye, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), that enable Russia to acquire desperately-needed technology and equipment from abroad.

For the names and identification information of the designated individuals, entities, and vessels, see the May 1, 2024, BankersOnline OFAC Update.

The first 2024 issue of Consumer Compliance Outlook has been released, and is available on the Federal Reserve System’s Consumer Compliance Outlook webpage. Included in this issue are articles on:

• Overview of Private Flood Insurance Compliance Requirements
• Consumer Compliance Requirements for Commercial Products and Services
• Compliance Spotlight: Resources to Combat Increased Check Fraud
• Recent Supervisory Data for Institutions the Federal Reserve Supervises
• and more

The CFPB on Tuesday published research that suggests consumers tend to pay more for products that have more complex pricing structures. The report is based on experiments with multiple rounds of buyers and sellers interacting in simple markets, and found that participants tended to pay more when prices were broken into sub-parts and were harder to understand. The research, said the CFPB, has implications for understanding how junk fees impede fair and competitive pricing in markets like auto loans or mortgages, where consumers have to evaluate extended warranties, add-ons, closing costs, and a wide variety of other fees instead of an all-inclusive price.

While not expected to exactly mirror real-world transactions, the CFPB found in these experiments that more complex pricing generally led to more detrimental outcomes for consumers:

• Higher total prices: Sellers' total asking prices were 60 percent higher in markets with 16 sub-prices than in those with one price.
• Comparing prices was more difficult: Buyers were 15 times more likely to select a higher-priced option in markets with 16 sub-prices than in those with one price.
• Consumers paid more overall: Transaction prices were 70 percent higher in markets with 16 sub-prices than in those with one price, on average.

The CFPB has previously highlighted how the use of complex terms and pricing can pose challenges for consumers. In many instances, consumers face complex pricing when shopping for financial products and services including credit cards, checking and savings accounts, mortgages, and auto loans.

• Price Complexity in Laboratory Markets

The Department of Housing and Urban Development has reported it has approved a Conciliation Agreement under the Fair Housing Act between the Metropolitan Management Corporation and Lancaster Court Associates, both of Narberth, Pennsylvania, and a family of former tenants. The agreement resolves allegations that the housing providers discriminated against the family when terminating their lease because a member of the family had a second child. The Fair Housing Acts makes it illegal to discriminate in the sale or rental of housing based on race, color, national origin, disability, religion, sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity), and familial status.

The agreement stems from a complaint alleging that Metropolitan Management Corporation and Lancaster Court Associates violated the Fair Housing Act by having an overly rigid occupancy policy that discriminated based on familial status. The complaint alleges that when a baby was born to a family of four, Respondents terminated the family’s lease for a two-bedroom unit because of Respondents’ occupancy policy.