This seems to be an on-going hot topic for banks. What about for SARs that have a long period of gap between supplemental filings?
For example:
1st SAR filed on 11/15/13, covering from 1/1/13 to 8/31/13.
2nd SAR should cover at least from 9/1/13 to 11/30/13. But because the first SAR was filed on 11/15/13, we'd have to wait at least 90 days to file the 2nd SAR, which will be on 2/13/14. By filing on 2/13/14, the covered period will be expanded from 9/1/13 to 1/31/14, which would encompass well over 90 days.
So the question is: since this is a "90 day" supplemental SAR, are we required to stick to the 90 day activity, or can we expand the review up to date without violating the regulations? If the latter is okay, it would no longer be a 90 day review, is it not?
_________________________
"Give thanks in all circumstances; for this is God's will for you in Christ Jesus." -Thessalonians 5:18