any repayments made by the consumer will replenish the available balance which can be drawn again like a revolving line of credit.
If you are reasonably contemplating the borrower to make regular repayments and advances then IMO the loan should be treated and disclosed as a HELOC, not as a reverse mortgage. The commentary to 226.33 even refers to "closed-end reverse mortgage transaction".
If you are setting these up for "repeat" transactions then I do not feel they would be reverse mortgages. "Repeat" transactions as I am referring to are transactions that are drawn, repaid and then redrawn.
Now as a side note I never researched, and I hope I never have to, the in and outs of reverse mortgages. I have strictly given you my opinion as I understand open-end credit and reverse mortgages from the provisions of Reg. Z.