Skip to content
BOL Conferences
Thread Options
#1588462 - 08/05/11 06:09 PM Section 6 QWR Change effective ??
fslic banker Offline
100 Club
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 170
I was updating my paper Fed Reserve Supr Service today and noticed that Section 6(e) of RESPA (Duty of loan srvicer to respond to borrowers inquiries) had been amended and now requires servicers to respond to a qualified written request within 5 days rather than 20 and to now take action within 30 days instead of the previous 60. However, there was no update to Reg X's 3500.21. So, are we required to comply with the statutory provision or wait for 3500.21 to be updated before complying. I wasn't able to find this RESPA change within the DFA itself.

Return to Top
RESPA
#1588488 - 08/05/11 06:38 PM Re: Section 6 QWR Change effective ?? fslic banker
NotDoneYet Offline
Gold Star
NotDoneYet
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 482
PA
In the Dodd-Frank Act, H.R. 4173-809, covers the change in response time per RESPA. I haven't really looked to see when it becomes effective.

Return to Top
#1662415 - 02/08/12 10:57 PM Re: Section 6 QWR Change effective ?? fslic banker
CalifDreamin Offline
Diamond Poster
CalifDreamin
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,280
Far from Calif
*BUMP*

Hadn't heard anything about this until yesterday, but it was effective in July 2010?????

Any gurus know what the deal is on this?
_________________________
The opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily reflect those of my employer
_._._._._._.
A.S.A.P.
Always
Say
A
Prayer
<><

Return to Top
#1703215 - 05/24/12 09:28 PM Re: Section 6 QWR Change effective ?? fslic banker
Tesla Offline
Power Poster
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,738
**BUMP-BUMP**

Starting a review on this and I can't find if the DFA changes are already in effect or not. Anyone know for sure?
_________________________
It's not that I take life for granted. It's only that the good won't make it. Innocence dies, while Villany Thrives.

Return to Top
#1748656 - 10/11/12 07:46 PM Re: Section 6 QWR Change effective ?? Tesla
Marnie Offline
Gold Star
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 437
Nevada
USC 2605 still shows 20 days for acknowledgement of the QWR, whereas FDIC 6500 Consumer Protection RESPA says 5 days, not 20. HUD website says 20 days

I was under the impression it wasn't going to change to 5 days till the finalization of Dodd Frank. When was FDIC changed and why not the USC? Which is to be followed?

Return to Top
#1748709 - 10/11/12 08:37 PM Re: Section 6 QWR Change effective ?? fslic banker
John Burnett Offline
10K Club
John Burnett
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 40,086
Cape Cod
The USC hasn't been changed because the Dodd Frank Act provision (section 1463(c)) making the amendment is part of Title XIV (MRAPLA), which isn't effective until the effective date of the regulations implementing the requirement, which may not be more than 12 months after the final regulations are issued, which in turn must be on or before January 21, 2013. If the final regulations aren't issued by January 21, 2013, the change to RESPA will be effective on January 21, 2013. It's confusing as heck, but it's found in section 1400(c) of MRAPLA/DFA.

The FDIC appears to have jumped the gun on updating its version of RESPA. It's a mistake. Ironically, they still have the HUD regulation up on their site even though the Bureau's reg X is the one in effect. Go figure!
_________________________
John S. Burnett
BankersOnline.com
Fighting for Compliance since 1976
Bankers' Threads User #8

Return to Top
#1748712 - 10/11/12 08:42 PM Re: Section 6 QWR Change effective ?? fslic banker
John Burnett Offline
10K Club
John Burnett
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 40,086
Cape Cod
They also have included DFA changes to TILA that become effective on the same schedule, but have the Fed's old Reg Z instead of the Bureau's. And the Fed's old Reg E.

And now that I've read the first posts in this thread, it appears the Fed has done the same leap as the FDIC when it comes to updating the RESPA law in its service.

Just rest assured, the change is not yet effective because the Bureau's Reg X hasn't yet been finally issued.
Last edited by John Burnett; 10/11/12 08:48 PM.
_________________________
John S. Burnett
BankersOnline.com
Fighting for Compliance since 1976
Bankers' Threads User #8

Return to Top
#1748713 - 10/11/12 08:43 PM Re: Section 6 QWR Change effective ?? John Burnett
Marnie Offline
Gold Star
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 437
Nevada
Thanks so much for your response!

Return to Top
#1749224 - 10/15/12 03:01 PM Re: Section 6 QWR Change effective ?? fslic banker
Confused Again Offline
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 26
John, originally the effective date of section 1463 Title XIV was to be the "Earlier of date final regulations implementing section take effect or 18 months after Designated Transfer Date." Designated Transfer Date was September 20, 2010.

I realize that the official proposal from the CFPB just recently came out, but I can't find where the original effective date was overridden. Where can I find that?

Thanks.

Return to Top
#1749245 - 10/15/12 03:47 PM Re: Section 6 QWR Change effective ?? fslic banker
rlcarey Online
10K Club
rlcarey
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 84,347
Galveston, TX
Designated Transfer Date was September 20, 2010.

That is not a true statement. That is the day the date was announced and published in the Federal Register. The designated transfer date was July, 21 2011.
_________________________
The opinions expressed here should not be construed to be those of my employer: PPDocs.com

Return to Top

Moderator:  QCL