Yes! They did say that, but it was a blink-and-you'll-miss-it statement. It was not in the body of the presentation (slide show) at all, and came near the very end when they did a couple of Q&As. I too, have tried to go back to hear it again, only to also by stymied by technical issues with the replay.
They said clearly that FEMA's RCV is NOT to be used to determine value, and then said something like "refer to FEMA's cost value worksheet for details."
Now, to perhaps color in some details.... The ABA RCC had a session on the Flood Q&As. In that session, the speaker offered a bit of explanation about the FEMA RCV. Apparently, some flood policies are listing both a "FEMA RCV" and an "Agent RCV". The speaker said the FEMA RCV is only one of several factors used in Risk Rating 2.0's Equity in Action premium pricing. It is not a reliable valuation for actual replacement cost, and is not used for claim payment. So don't use it. The "Agent RCV" (or whatever it is called) is more reliable and usable.
In short:
The "Agent RCV" is used to determine how much coverage to BUY for replacement- a better measure of coverage needed.
The "FEMA RCV" is used to determine how much to PAY for the insurance selected, and factors in much more than the collateral, including zip code, square footage, number of stories, etc. It is about making policy cost more equitable.
Last edited by RebekahL CRCM; 08/09/22 04:46 PM.
_________________________
Me, Type A? Maybe - I'm not done analyzing it yet.